These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38236888)

  • 1. Rethinking Personhood through the Lens of Life Forms, Communality, and Moral Agency.
    Wolemonwu VC; Mitra P; Bolanle A
    Am J Bioeth; 2024 Jan; 24(1):64-67. PubMed ID: 38236888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The substance view: a critique (part 2).
    Lovering R
    Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):378-86. PubMed ID: 22994595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Autonomy" and the "quality of life": the dismantling of moral terms.
    Arkes H
    Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):421-33. PubMed ID: 3650212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The moral status of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants.
    Strong C
    J Med Philos; 1997 Oct; 22(5):457-78. PubMed ID: 9360198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The neonate: a community's moral compass?
    Isaacs D; Kent A
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2012 Sep; 48(9):715-6. PubMed ID: 22970661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
    Agar N
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Feb; 39(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 22923439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Substance View: A Critique (Part 3).
    Lovering R
    Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):305-312. PubMed ID: 28008642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elephants, Personhood, and Moral Status.
    DeGrazia D
    Perspect Biol Med; 2023; 66(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 38662005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. To what do we have moral obligations and why? II.
    Gillon R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6483):1734-6. PubMed ID: 3924233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relevance of a biological definition of life to fundamental rights.
    Main EJ
    Med Law; 1987; 6(3):189-209. PubMed ID: 3586886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The substance view: a critique.
    Lovering R
    Bioethics; 2013 Jun; 27(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 22296684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To what do we have moral obligations and why? I.
    Gillon R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6482):1646-7. PubMed ID: 3924205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personhood and human embryos and fetuses.
    Tauer CA
    J Med Philos; 1985 Aug; 10(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 4045333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion: the avoidable moral dilemma.
    Humber JM
    J Value Inq; 1975; 9(4):282-302. PubMed ID: 11663636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The moral status of intellectually disabled individuals.
    Edwards SD
    J Med Philos; 1997 Feb; 22(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 9095460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What makes a human being to be a being of moral worth?
    May WE
    Thomist; 1976 Jul; 40(3):416-43. PubMed ID: 11663735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human embryos and the argument from potential.
    Gillon R
    J Med Ethics; 1991 Jun; 17(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 1870083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human being: the boundaries of the concept.
    Becker LC
    Philos Public Aff; 1975; 4(2):334-59. PubMed ID: 11663649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Our bodies, our souls: rethinking pro-choice rhetoric.
    Wolf N
    New Repub; 1995 Oct; 213(16):26, 28-29, 32-35. PubMed ID: 11656511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An exchange of views: 'moral consistency and abortion'.
    Stith RT
    Commonweal; 1974 May; 100(11):261-4. PubMed ID: 11663495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.