These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38236983)

  • 1. EPA scraps plan to end all testing in mammals by 2035.
    Grimm D
    Science; 2024 Jan; 383(6680):248. PubMed ID: 38236983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EPA plan to end animal testing splits scientists.
    Grimm D
    Science; 2019 Sep; 365(6459):1231. PubMed ID: 31604217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animal tests surge under new U.S. chemical law.
    Zainzinger V
    Science; 2018 May; 360(6389):585-586. PubMed ID: 29748261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Building a robust 21st century chemical testing program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: recommendations for strengthening scientific engagement.
    McPartland J; Dantzker HC; Portier CJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2015 Jan; 123(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25343778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future direction of ecological risk assessment in the United States: reflecting on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's "Examination of risk assessment practices and principles".
    DeMott RP; Balaraman A; Sorensen MT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Jan; 1(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16637151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's examination of its risk assessment principles and practices: a brief perspective from the regulated community.
    Stahl RG; Guiseppi-Elie A; Bingman TS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Jan; 1(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16637153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's risk assessment guidelines.
    Jarabek AM; Farland WH
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):199-216. PubMed ID: 2274984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Animal testing and EPA.
    Farland WH; Vaughn-Dellarco V
    Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5244):1907, 1909. PubMed ID: 8533076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's inhalation RfD methodology: risk assessment for air toxics.
    Jarabek AM; Menache MG; Overton JH; Dourson ML; Miller FJ
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):279-301. PubMed ID: 1670284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use and acceptance of Other Scientifically Relevant Information (OSRI) in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.
    Bishop PL; Willett CE
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 101(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 24151143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's activities to prepare for regulatory and risk assessment applications of genomics information.
    Benson WH; Gallagher K; McClintock JT
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2007 Jun; 48(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 17567849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pesticide testing. EPA draft rules for human subjects draw fire.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):232. PubMed ID: 16002591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part II: The developmental toxicity testing guideline.
    Claudio L; Bearer CF; Wallinga D
    Am J Ind Med; 1999 Jun; 35(6):554-63. PubMed ID: 10332508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pesticide toxicity, human subjects, and the Environmental Protection Agency's dilemma.
    Robertson HG; Gorovitz S
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):427-58. PubMed ID: 10921235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EPA ponders pesticide tests in humans.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 Jan; 283(5398):18-9. PubMed ID: 9917257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Animal use and lessons learned in the U.S. High Production Volume Chemicals Challenge Program.
    Bishop PL; Manuppello JR; Willett CE; Sandler JT
    Environ Health Perspect; 2012 Dec; 120(12):1631-9. PubMed ID: 23033452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches for describing and communicating overall uncertainty in toxicity characterizations: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as a case study.
    Beck NB; Becker RA; Erraguntla N; Farland WH; Grant RL; Gray G; Kirman C; LaKind JS; Jeffrey Lewis R; Nance P; Pottenger LH; Santos SL; Shirley S; Simon T; Dourson ML
    Environ Int; 2016; 89-90():110-28. PubMed ID: 26827183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency strategic plan for evaluating the toxicity of chemicals.
    Firestone M; Kavlock R; Zenick H; Kramer M;
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):139-62. PubMed ID: 20574895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.