These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38237064)

  • 41. A bias-exchange approach to protein folding.
    Piana S; Laio A
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 May; 111(17):4553-9. PubMed ID: 17419610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sampling free energy surfaces as slices by combining umbrella sampling and metadynamics.
    Awasthi S; Kapil V; Nair NN
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Jun; 37(16):1413-24. PubMed ID: 27059305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Efficient sampling over rough energy landscapes with high barriers: A combination of metadynamics with integrated tempering sampling.
    Yang YI; Zhang J; Che X; Yang L; Gao YQ
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Mar; 144(9):094105. PubMed ID: 26957155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Spectral Map: Embedding Slow Kinetics in Collective Variables.
    Rydzewski J
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2023 Jun; 14(22):5216-5220. PubMed ID: 37260045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reweighted Manifold Learning of Collective Variables from Enhanced Sampling Simulations.
    Rydzewski J; Chen M; Ghosh TK; Valsson O
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Dec; 18(12):7179-7192. PubMed ID: 36367826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ligand-Binding Calculations with Metadynamics.
    Provasi D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():233-253. PubMed ID: 31396906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Folding a small protein using harmonic linear discriminant analysis.
    Mendels D; Piccini G; Brotzakis ZF; Yang YI; Parrinello M
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Nov; 149(19):194113. PubMed ID: 30466286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Increasing the Sampling Efficiency of Protein Conformational Change by Combining a Modified Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics and Normal Mode Analysis.
    Peng C; Wang J; Shi Y; Xu Z; Zhu W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jan; 17(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 33351613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accelerating the Conformational Sampling of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Do TN; Choy WY; Karttunen M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Nov; 10(11):5081-94. PubMed ID: 26584388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Adaptive Path Collective Variable: A Versatile Biasing Approach to Compute the Average Transition Path and Free Energy of Molecular Transitions.
    Pérez de Alba Ortíz A; Vreede J; Ensing B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():255-290. PubMed ID: 31396907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Continuous metadynamics in essential coordinates as a tool for free energy modelling of conformational changes.
    Spiwok V; Králová B; Tvaroska I
    J Mol Model; 2008 Nov; 14(11):995-1002. PubMed ID: 18633653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A variational conformational dynamics approach to the selection of collective variables in metadynamics.
    McCarty J; Parrinello M
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Nov; 147(20):204109. PubMed ID: 29195289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Metadynamics in the conformational space nonlinearly dimensionally reduced by Isomap.
    Spiwok V; Králová B
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Dec; 135(22):224504. PubMed ID: 22168700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A data-guided approach for the evaluation of zeolites for hydrogen storage with the aid of molecular simulations.
    Manda T; Barasa GO; Louis H; Irfan A; Agumba JO; Lugasi SO; Pembere AMS
    J Mol Model; 2024 Jan; 30(2):43. PubMed ID: 38236500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Improving the accuracy and convergence of drug permeation simulations via machine-learned collective variables.
    Aydin F; Durumeric AEP; da Hora GCA; Nguyen JDM; Oh MI; Swanson JMJ
    J Chem Phys; 2021 Jul; 155(4):045101. PubMed ID: 34340389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Computational methods for exploring protein conformations.
    Allison JR
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2020 Aug; 48(4):1707-1724. PubMed ID: 32756904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. How to Determine Accurate Conformational Ensembles by Metadynamics Metainference: A Chignolin Study Case.
    Paissoni C; Camilloni C
    Front Mol Biosci; 2021; 8():694130. PubMed ID: 34124166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Investigating drug-target association and dissociation mechanisms using metadynamics-based algorithms.
    Cavalli A; Spitaleri A; Saladino G; Gervasio FL
    Acc Chem Res; 2015 Feb; 48(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 25496113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Long dynamics simulations of proteins using atomistic force fields and a continuum representation of solvent effects: calculation of structural and dynamic properties.
    Li X; Hassan SA; Mehler EL
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(3):464-84. PubMed ID: 15959866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Metadynamics Simulations to Study the Structural Ensembles and Binding Processes of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Zhou R; Duan M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2405():169-178. PubMed ID: 35298814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.