These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38237474)

  • 1. Task-relevance and change detection in action-effect binding.
    Varga S; Pfister R; Neszmélyi B; Kunde W; Horváth J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Mar; 243():104147. PubMed ID: 38237474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binding and Retrieval of Response Durations: Subtle Evidence for Episodic Processing of Continuous Movement Features.
    Pfister R; Bogon J; Foerster A; Kunde W; Moeller B
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 36072101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binding of Task-Irrelevant Action Features and Auditory Action Effects.
    Varga S; Pfister R; Neszmélyi B; Kunde W; Horváth J
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):35. PubMed ID: 36072116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching.
    Benini E; Koch I; Mayr S; Frings C; Philipp AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Aug; 76(8):1872-1888. PubMed ID: 36112986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Goal-Based Binding of Irrelevant Stimulus Features for Action Slips.
    Foerster A; Rothermund K; Parmar JJ; Moeller B; Frings C; Pfister R
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Jul; 68(4):206-213. PubMed ID: 34918539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responding, fast and slow: Visual detection and localization performance is unaffected by retrieval.
    Schöpper LM; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):171-185. PubMed ID: 37985594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance.
    Schöpper LM; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):438-451. PubMed ID: 35107812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bound to a spider without its web: Task-type modulates the retrieval of affective information in subsequent responses.
    Schöpper LM; Jerusalem A; Lötzke L; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2655-2672. PubMed ID: 37853167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching.
    Benini E; Koch I; Mayr S; Frings C; Philipp AM
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):29. PubMed ID: 36072099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking.
    Pelzer L; Naefgen C; Gaschler R; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2022 Apr; 86(3):952-967. PubMed ID: 33885955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-action effect binding: A critical re-assessment.
    Weller L; Kunde W; Pfister R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():137-146. PubMed ID: 28942126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus-response episodes.
    Qiu R; Möller M; Koch I; Mayr S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1264-1285. PubMed ID: 35048312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. All together now: Simultaneous feature integration and feature retrieval in action control.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):512-520. PubMed ID: 34713410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection versus discrimination: The limits of binding accounts in action control.
    Schöpper LM; Hilchey MD; Lappe M; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2085-2097. PubMed ID: 31823230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binding of response-independent task rules.
    Schiltenwolf M; Dignath D; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1821-1832. PubMed ID: 38302791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of task-triggered retrieval of the previous response: a binding perspective on response-repetition benefits in task switching.
    Benini E; Möller M; Koch I; Philipp AM; Qiu R; Mayr S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1290-1300. PubMed ID: 37957478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mighty tool not only in perception: Figure-ground mechanisms control binding and retrieval alike.
    Schmalbrock P; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2255-2270. PubMed ID: 35610411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Element-level features in conjoint episodes in dual-tasking.
    Pelzer L; Naefgen C; Gaschler R; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1193-1207. PubMed ID: 35948687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.