These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38237474)

  • 21. Preattentive binding of auditory and visual stimulus features.
    Winkler I; Czigler I; Sussman E; Horváth J; Balázs L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 17(2):320-39. PubMed ID: 15811243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the selection of stimulus for the auditory variant of the detection response task method for driving experiments.
    Stojmenova K; Policardi F; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28594238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus-action priming.
    Jargow J; Wolfensteller U; Pfeuffer CU; Ruge H
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2195-2214. PubMed ID: 35041058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference?
    Hommel B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):751-757. PubMed ID: 32378119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Across-task long-term priming: interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval.
    Waszak F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1414-29. PubMed ID: 20043270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.
    Moeller B; Schächinger H; Frings C
    J Vis Exp; 2014 May; (87):. PubMed ID: 24893586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binding Error-Induced Control States.
    Foerster A; Schiltenwolf M; Dignath D; Pfister R
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):24. PubMed ID: 36072103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations.
    Mattes S; Leuthold H; Ulrich R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Oct; 55(4):1175-91. PubMed ID: 12420991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Response-repetition costs in choice-RT tasks: biased expectancies or response inhibition?
    Druey MD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():21-32. PubMed ID: 24269885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of stress on distractor-response bindings.
    Singh T; Domes G; Frings C
    Stress; 2021 Nov; 24(6):795-804. PubMed ID: 34060422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lingering Neural Representations of Past Task Features Adversely Affect Future Behavior.
    Rangel BO; Hazeltine E; Wessel JR
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jan; 43(2):282-292. PubMed ID: 36639905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Self-prioritization with unisensory and multisensory stimuli in a matching task.
    Desebrock C; Spence C; Barutchu A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1666-1688. PubMed ID: 35538291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective binding of stimulus, response, and effect features.
    Moeller B; Pfister R; Kunde W; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1627-1632. PubMed ID: 31325038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.
    Logan GD; Schulkind MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Jun; 26(3):1072-90. PubMed ID: 10884010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.