159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38237520)
1. Contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Current status and future challenges.
van Nijnatten TJA; Morscheid S; Baltzer PAT; Clauser P; Alcantara R; Kuhl CK; Wildberger JE
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 171():111312. PubMed ID: 38237520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening.
Coffey K; Jochelson MS
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110513. PubMed ID: 36108478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.
Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare.
Blankenburg M; Sánchez-Collado I; Soyemi BO; Åkerborg Ö; Caleyachetty A; Harris J; Morris E; Newstead G; Lobig F
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):850-861. PubMed ID: 37278659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of Supplemental Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: Findings From an Umbrella Review and Primary Studies Analysis.
Lobig F; Caleyachetty A; Forrester L; Morris E; Newstead G; Harris J; Blankenburg M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Jul; 23(5):478-490. PubMed ID: 37202338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
Covington MF
Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future.
Sogani J; Mango VL; Keating D; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
Clin Imaging; 2021 Jan; 69():269-279. PubMed ID: 33032103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient perspectives on repeated contrast-enhanced mammography and magnetic resonance during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer.
Pires-Gonçalves L; Henriques Abreu M; Ferrão A; Guimarães Dos Santos A; Aguiar AT; Gouvêa M; Henrique R
Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 36575580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer].
Fischer U; Diekmann F; Helbich T; Preibsch H; Püsken M; Wenkel E; Wienbeck S; Fallenberg EM
Radiologie (Heidelb); 2023 Dec; 63(12):916-924. PubMed ID: 37889284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.
Verburg E; van Gils CH; Bakker MF; Viergever MA; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):438-444. PubMed ID: 32149858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging findings for response evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ploumen RAW; de Mooij CM; Gommers S; Keymeulen KBMI; Smidt ML; van Nijnatten TJA
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5423-5435. PubMed ID: 37020070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.
Nida BA; Rooney TB; Miller MM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36000664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Current Applications and Future Directions.
Ghaderi KF; Phillips J; Perry H; Lotfi P; Mehta TS
Radiographics; 2019; 39(7):1907-1920. PubMed ID: 31697627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer.
Berg WA; Bandos AI; Sava MG
J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Aug; 20(8):758-768. PubMed ID: 37394083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast enhanced mammography: focus on frequently encountered benign and malignant diagnoses.
Yang ML; Bhimani C; Roth R; Germaine P
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 36691077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: Contrast-enhanced mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shahraki Z; Ghaffari M; Nakhaie Moghadam M; Parooie F; Salarzaei M
Breast Dis; 2022; 41(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 35754256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
