These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3823756)
1. [The quality of the roentgen image--a recommendation for quantifying image quality]. Borcke E Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jan; 40(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 3823756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Modification of the quality of the roentgen image by screen and film--experimental studies]. Maurer HJ; Goos F Rontgenblatter; 1985 Feb; 38(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 3983537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Assuring image quality in roentgen diagnostic services--information on DIN 6868. Part 2. Film processing: evaluating the uniformity of visual optic density]. Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3576371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [DIN 6868: a standard series for assuring image quality in roentgen diagnostic services]. Kütterer G Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 3576370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)]. Weberling R Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A debatable issue: indications for the selection and use of absorber materials]. Kütterer G Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Sep; 2(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 1420385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Photography schedule in x-ray diagnostic facilities using image intensifiers]. Iakobson AM; Chuĭko GA; Marko VA Med Tekh; 1982; (4):27-31. PubMed ID: 7132630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Studies on the image quality of x-ray films of the thorax (author's transl)]. Wolfart W; Rost MP Prax Klin Pneumol; 1981 Mar; 35(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 7232283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [On the image quality in radiology. VI: comparison of image quality in various image-producing systems]. Angerstein W; Stargardt A Rontgenpraxis; 1968 Aug; 21(8):191-6 contd. PubMed ID: 5687228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography. Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance in CT. Stein KM Radiol Technol; 2000; 72(1):67. PubMed ID: 11019412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique]. Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Image quality test for video amplifier and television units]. Dümmling K Rontgenpraxis; 1969 Aug; 22(8):190-205. PubMed ID: 5352474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A Simulator for X-ray images. Fanti V; Marzeddu R; Massazza G; Randaccio P; Brunetti A; Golosio B Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):350-4. PubMed ID: 15933135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quality control of Roentgen equipment with automatic exposure using a newly developed test phantom. Part II: surface dose, image parameters and quality number (author's transl)]. Hagemann G Rontgenblatter; 1980 Sep; 33(9):475-82. PubMed ID: 7414228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Use of a measuring device for determining the characteristic parameters of roentgen intensifying screens]. Mischke W; Tautz M; Brandt GA Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1982; 23(5):689-98. PubMed ID: 7178478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]