165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38238017)
1. Automated Versus Handheld Breast Ultrasound for Evaluating Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Shin SU; Rim J; Kang E; Kim EK; Shin HC; Park SY; Kim B
Korean J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 25(2):146-156. PubMed ID: 38238017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility and Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Evaluating Pure Non-Mass Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Shin SU; Yi A; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 32729267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integration of Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound among Women with Negative Mammographic Screening Findings: A Multi-center Population-based Study in China.
Ren W; Yan H; Zhao X; Jia M; Zhang S; Zhang J; Li Z; Ming L; Zhang Y; Li H; He L; Li X; Cheng X; Yue L; Zhou W; Qiao Y; Zhao F
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S114-S126. PubMed ID: 37003874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI: predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
Chung J; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Kim EK; Ryu YH; Son EJ
Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 24234236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for patients with suspicious node positive breast cancer.
Nakamura R; Yamamoto N; Miyaki T; Itami M; Shina N; Ohtsuka M
Breast Cancer; 2018 Jan; 25(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 28735457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between execution and reading time of 3D ABUS versus HHUS.
Brunetti N; De Giorgis S; Zawaideh J; Rossi F; Calabrese M; Tagliafico AS
Radiol Med; 2020 Dec; 125(12):1243-1248. PubMed ID: 32367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Axillary Nodal Metastases in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: Comparison of Node Detection and Morphology by Ultrasound.
Chung HL; Tso HH; Middleton LP; Sun J; Leung JWT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jan; 218(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 34319162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of axillary ultrasound and standard breast MRI for differentiation between limited and advanced axillary nodal disease in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.
Samiei S; van Nijnatten TJA; van Beek HC; Polak MPJ; Maaskant-Braat AJG; Heuts EM; van Kuijk SMJ; Schipper RJ; Lobbes MBI; Smidt ML
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17476. PubMed ID: 31767929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Routine use of standard breast MRI compared to axillary ultrasound for differentiating between no, limited and advanced axillary nodal disease in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
van Nijnatten TJA; Ploumen EH; Schipper RJ; Goorts B; Andriessen EH; Vanwetswinkel S; Schavemaker M; Nelemans P; de Vries B; Beets-Tan RGH; Smidt ML; Lobbes MBI
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2288-2294. PubMed ID: 27842679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance Using Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer in Chinese Women Aged 40 Years or Older: A Comparative Study.
Zhang L; Bao LY; Tan YJ; Zhu LQ; Xu XJ; Zhu QQ; Shan YN; Zhao J; Xie LS; Liu J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3137-3144. PubMed ID: 31563481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does ultrasound evaluation of the axilla increase the rate of axillary lymph node dissection in early stage clinically node negative breast cancer patients?
Vasigh M; Meshkati Yazd SM; Karoobi M; Hajebi R; Yazdankhah Kenari A
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 35241059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Potential of Adding Mammography to Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS Ultrasound Category 4a: A Multicenter Hospital-Based Study in China.
Ren W; Zhao X; Zhao X; Yan H; Hu S; Qiao Y; Xu Z; Zhao F
Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3301-3314. PubMed ID: 36975464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
