166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38238017)
21. Reproducibility of Automated Breast Ultrasonography and Handheld Ultrasonography for Breast Lesion Size Measurement.
Park KW; Ko EY; Park S; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Kwon MR
Ultrasound Q; 2022 Jan; 38(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 35001027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative analysis of axillary nodal burden in ultrasound/biopsy positive axilla vs ultrasound negative sentinel lymph node biopsy positive axilla.
Tandon M; Ball W; Kirby R; Soumian S; Narayanan S
Breast Dis; 2019; 38(3-4):93-96. PubMed ID: 30909179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging increases diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging for predicting axillary metastases in breast cancer patients.
Guvenc I; Whitman GJ; Liu P; Yalniz C; Ma J; Dogan BE
Breast J; 2019 Jan; 25(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30444286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Association between US features of primary tumor and axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical T1-T2N0 breast cancer.
Bae MS; Shin SU; Song SE; Ryu HS; Han W; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2018 Apr; 59(4):402-408. PubMed ID: 28748712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A multicenter, hospital-based and non-inferiority study for diagnostic efficacy of automated whole breast ultrasound for breast cancer in China.
Xin Y; Zhang X; Yang Y; Chen Y; Wang Y; Zhou X; Qiao Y
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13902. PubMed ID: 34230562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A multivariable model of ultrasound and clinicopathological features for predicting axillary nodal burden of breast cancer: potential to prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection.
Yang L; Gu Y; Wang B; Sun M; Zhang L; Shi L; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Yin Y
BMC Cancer; 2023 Dec; 23(1):1264. PubMed ID: 38129804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS)-based radiomics nomogram: an individualized tool for predicting axillary lymph node tumor burden in patients with early breast cancer.
Chen Y; Xie Y; Li B; Shao H; Na Z; Wang Q; Jing H
BMC Cancer; 2023 Apr; 23(1):340. PubMed ID: 37055722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sonographic evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer at the university college hospital Ibadan, Nigeria.
Hafiz A; Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT; Ademola AF; Obajimi MO
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2018; 25(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30027918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Axillary Staging of Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer by Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: Which Ultrasound Criteria for Classifying Abnormal Lymph Nodes Should Be Adopted in the Post-ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Era?
Zhu Y; Zhou W; Zhou JQ; Fei XC; Ye TJ; Huang O; Chen XS; Zhan WW
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 27009312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG).
Chen H; Han M; Jing H; Liu Z; Shang H; Wang Q; Cheng W
Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():9193-9202. PubMed ID: 34880658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A multicenter hospital-based diagnosis study of automated breast ultrasound system in detecting breast cancer among Chinese women.
Zhang X; Lin X; Tan Y; Zhu Y; Wang H; Feng R; Tang G; Zhou X; Li A; Qiao Y
Chin J Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 30(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 29861608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cortical morphologic features of axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of metastasis in breast cancer: in vitro sonographic study.
Bedi DG; Krishnamurthy R; Krishnamurthy S; Edeiken BS; Le-Petross H; Fornage BD; Bassett RL; Hunt KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18716089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Feasibility of ABUS as an Alternative to Handheld Ultrasound for Response Control in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment.
Hatzipanagiotou ME; Huber D; Gerthofer V; Hetterich M; Ripoll BR; Ortmann O; Seitz S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Feb; 22(2):e142-e146. PubMed ID: 34219020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Normal Axillary Ultrasound Excludes Heavy Nodal Disease Burden in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Jackson RS; Mylander C; Rosman M; Andrade R; Sawyer K; Sanders T; Tafra L
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3289-95. PubMed ID: 26224404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound in the Selection of Patients With a Heavy Axillary Tumor Burden in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: What Leads to False-Positive Results?
Zhu Y; Zhou W; Jia XH; Huang O; Zhan WW
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 29424451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Axillary lymph node biopsy in newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer: comparative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus core-needle biopsy.
Rautiainen S; Masarwah A; Sudah M; Sutela A; Pelkonen O; Joukainen S; Sironen R; Kärjä V; Vanninen R
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 23771915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of the Two-View Scan Technique in Women with Small Breasts.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim SY; Lee SM; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31920026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison and risk factors analysis of multiple breast cancer screening methods in the evaluation of breast non-mass-like lesions.
Zhang J; Cai L; Pan X; Chen L; Chen M; Yan D; Liu J; Luo L
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Nov; 22(1):202. PubMed ID: 36404330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
