These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38238681)

  • 21. Circular vs. linear stapling after minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a pooled analysis.
    Finze A; Betzler J; Hetjens S; Reissfelder C; Otto M; Blank S
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Aug; 407(5):1831-1838. PubMed ID: 35731445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. FA01.02: THE EFFECT OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER MIE ON LONG-TERM SURVIVAL: A RETROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER COHORT STUDY.
    Fransen L; Berkelmans G; Asti E; Van Berge Henegouwen M; Berlth F; Bonavina L; Brown A; Bruns C; Gisbertz S; Grimminger P; Gutschow C; Hölscher A; Kauppi J; Lagarde SM; Mercer S; Moons J; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Palazzo F; Pattyn P; Philippron A; Raptis D; Räsänen J; Rosato E; Rouvelas I; Schmidt H; Schneider P; Schröder W; Wijnhoven BPL; Grard AP; Nieuwenhuijzen ; Luyer M
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A low surgical Apgar score is a predictor of anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy, but not a prognostic factor.
    Hayashi M; Kawakubo H; Mayanagi S; Nakamura R; Suda K; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Esophagus; 2019 Oct; 16(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 31165934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional visualization system is one of the factors that improve short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Kudo T; Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):631-639. PubMed ID: 33196872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Impact of Postoperative Complications on Survivals After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Booka E; Takeuchi H; Nishi T; Matsuda S; Kaburagi T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Takahashi T; Wada N; Kawakubo H; Omori T; Kitagawa Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Aug; 94(33):e1369. PubMed ID: 26287423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.
    Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
    Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
    Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Jin Z; Zhu K; Sun J; Zhang J; Zhang B
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(1):90. PubMed ID: 36945008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak?
    Wang YJ; Liu XH; Mei LY; Li KK; Jiang YG; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3943-9. PubMed ID: 26694179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perioperative management and outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: case study of a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan.
    Chang T; Hsiao PN; Tsai MY; Huang PM; Cheng YJ
    J Thorac Dis; 2018 Mar; 10(3):1670-1676. PubMed ID: 29707319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates.
    Kukar M; Ben-David K; Peng JS; Attwood K; Thomas RM; Hennon M; Nwogu C; Hochwald SN
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Aug; 24(8):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 31317458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.
    Ekeke CN; Kuiper GM; Luketich JD; Ruppert KM; Copelli SJ; Baker N; Levy RM; Awais O; Christie NA; Dhupar R; Pennathur A; Sarkaria IS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 166(2):374-382.e1. PubMed ID: 36732144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct Oral Feeding After a Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.
    Fransen LFC; Janssen THJB; Aarnoudse M; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP
    Ann Surg; 2022 May; 275(5):919-923. PubMed ID: 32541215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.
    Zhu ZY; Yong X; Luo RJ; Wang YZ
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 Sept.; 19(9):718-725. PubMed ID: 30178638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative Perioperative Outcomes by Esophagectomy Surgical Technique.
    Meredith KL; Maramara T; Blinn P; Lee D; Huston J; Shridhar R
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Jun; 24(6):1261-1268. PubMed ID: 31197697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Esophagus; 2018 Apr; 15(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29892934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.