BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38241345)

  • 1. Intersphincteric resection following robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy-assisted total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: a multicentre propensity score analysis of 1571 patients.
    Guo Y; He L; Tong W; Ren S; Chi Z; Tan K; Wang B; Lie C; Wang Q
    Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):1904-1912. PubMed ID: 38241345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].
    Sun R; Cong L; Qiu HZ; Lin GL; Wu B; Niu BZ; Sun XY; Zhou JL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 35754217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study.
    de'Angelis N; Marchegiani F; Martínez-Pérez A; Biondi A; Pucciarelli S; Schena CA; Pellino G; Kraft M; van Lieshout AS; Morelli L; Valverde A; Lupinacci RM; Gómez-Abril SA; Persiani R; Tuynman JB; Espin-Basany E; Ris F;
    BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38805357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
    Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
    Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Delayed Coloanal Anastomosis (TaTME-DCAA) Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (LTME) and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision (RTME) for Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Short-term Outcomes, Bowel Function, and Cost.
    Seow-En I; Wu J; Tan IE; Zhao Y; Seah AWM; Wee IJY; Ying-Ru Ng Y; Kwong-Wei Tan E
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2024 Feb; 34(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 37987634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis in Experienced Centers.
    Burghgraef TA; Crolla RMPH; Verheijen PM; Fahim M; van Geloven A; Leijtens JWA; Pronk A; Smits AB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Feb; 65(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 34459449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mesorectal fat area and mesorectal area affect the surgical difficulty of robotic-assisted mesorectal excision and intersphincteric resection respectively in different ways.
    Huang S; Chen M; Deng Y; Wang X; Lu X; Jiang W; Huang Y; Chi P
    Colorectal Dis; 2020 Sep; 22(9):1130-1138. PubMed ID: 32040248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of Low and Middle Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Persiani R; Biondi A; Pennestrì F; Fico V; De Simone V; Tirelli F; Santullo F; D'Ugo D
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Jul; 61(7):809-816. PubMed ID: 29771810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark.
    Perdawood SK; Al Khefagie GA
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jan; 18(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 26603786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
    Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
    Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Li Z; Wang Q; Ning W; Yang Q; Huang Y; Yan S; Yang B; Xie M
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6852-6860. PubMed ID: 37308763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complete intersphincteric longitudinal muscle excision May Be key to reducing local recurrence during intersphincteric resection.
    Kim JC; Kim CW; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 33642088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS;
    Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of short-term efficacy of transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer.
    Ren J; Liu S; Luo H; Wang B; Wu F
    Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):181-185. PubMed ID: 32461015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case-matched analysis.
    Sugoor P; Verma K; Chaturvedi A; Kannan S; Desouza A; Ostwal V; Engineer R; Saklani A
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1965. PubMed ID: 30318725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
    Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.