111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38241732)
1. Technical note: development of a simulation framework, enabling the investigation of locally tuned single energy proton radiography.
Lundberg M; Meijers A; Souris K; Deffet S; Weber DC; Lomax A; Knopf A
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38241732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical note: Flat panel proton radiography with a patient specific imaging field for accurate WEPL assessment.
Seller Oria C; Free J; Marmitt GG; Knäusl B; Brandenburg S; Knopf AC; Meijers A; Langendijk JA; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1756-1765. PubMed ID: 36629844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual ring multilayer ionization chamber and theory-based correction technique for scanning proton therapy.
Takayanagi T; Nihongi H; Nishiuchi H; Tadokoro M; Ito Y; Nakashima C; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Matsuda K; Sakae T; Terunuma T
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4150. PubMed ID: 27370135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical Note: First report on an in vivo range probing quality control procedure for scanned proton beam therapy in head and neck cancer patients.
Meijers A; Seller Oria C; Free J; Langendijk JA; Knopf AC; Both S
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 33428795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical Note: A direct ray-tracing method to compute integral depth dose in pencil beam proton radiography with a multilayer ionization chamber.
Farace P; Righetto R; Deffet S; Meijers A; Vander Stappen F
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6405. PubMed ID: 27908151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of range uncertainty in lung-like tissue using a porcine lung phantom and proton radiography.
Meijers A; Seller OC; Free J; Bondesson D; Seller Oria C; Rabe M; Parodi K; Landry G; Langendijk JA; Both S; Kurz C; Knopf AC
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 65(15):155014. PubMed ID: 32392543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel design of proton computed tomography detected by multiple-layer ionization chamber with strip chambers: A feasibility study with Monte Carlo simulation.
Chen X; Liu R; Zhou S; Sun B; Reynoso FJ; Mutic S; Zhang T; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):614-625. PubMed ID: 31705662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing calibration settings for accurate water equivalent path length assessment using flat panel proton radiography.
Seller Oria C; Marmitt GG; Free J; Langendijk JA; Both S; Knopf AC; Meijers A
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Oct; 66(21):. PubMed ID: 34598170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Registration of pencil beam proton radiography data with X-ray CT.
Deffet S; Macq B; Righetto R; Vander Stappen F; Farace P
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5393-5401. PubMed ID: 28771749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. openPR - A computational tool for CT conversion assessment with proton radiography.
Deffet S; Cohilis M; Souris K; Salvo K; Depuydt T; Sterpin E; Macq B
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):387-396. PubMed ID: 33125725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pencil beam proton radiography using a multilayer ionization chamber.
Farace P; Righetto R; Meijers A
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(11):4078-87. PubMed ID: 27164479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The optimal balance between quality and efficiency in proton radiography imaging technique at various proton beam energies: A Monte Carlo study.
Biegun AK; van Goethem MJ; van der Graaf ER; van Beuzekom M; Koffeman EN; Nakaji T; Takatsu J; Visser J; Brandenburg S
Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():141-146. PubMed ID: 28869137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A reconstruction approach for proton computed tomography by modeling the integral depth dose of the scanning proton pencil beam.
Chen X; Medrano M; Sun B; Hao Y; Reynoso FJ; Darafsheh A; Yang D; Zhang T; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2602-2620. PubMed ID: 35103331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sparse deconvolution of proton radiography data to estimate water equivalent thickness maps.
Deffet S; Farace P; Macq B
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):509-517. PubMed ID: 31705805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality evaluation of projection- and depth dose-based approaches to integrating proton radiography using a monolithic scintillator detector.
Tendler I; Robertson D; Darne C; Panthi R; Alsanea F; Collins-Fekete CA; Beddar S
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 66(14):. PubMed ID: 34144537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a deep learning-based material estimation model for Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton therapy.
Chang CW; Zhou S; Gao Y; Lin L; Liu T; Bradley JD; Zhang T; Zhou J; Yang X
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36174551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical characterization of therapeutic proton delivery through common dental materials.
Hu YH; Wan Chan Tseung HS; Mundy DW
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2904-2913. PubMed ID: 35276753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extension of the open-source TIGRE toolbox for proton imaging.
Kaser S; Bergauer T; Biguri A; Birkfellner W; Hatamikia S; Hirtl A; Irmler C; Kirchmayer B; Ulrich-Pur F
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):552-566. PubMed ID: 36195519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of characteristics of images acquired with a prototype clinical proton radiography system.
Sarosiek C; DeJongh EA; Coutrakon G; DeJongh DF; Duffin KL; Karonis NT; Ordoñez CE; Pankuch M; Rykalin V; Winans JR; Welsh JS
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2271-2278. PubMed ID: 33621368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark.
Hansen DC; Seco J; Sørensen TS; Petersen JB; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1638-42. PubMed ID: 26219959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
