150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38244403)
1. Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level.
Sedran L; Bonnet X; Thomas-Pohl M; Loiret I; Martinet N; Pillet H; Paysant J
J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111943. PubMed ID: 38244403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees.
Morgenroth DC; Segal AD; Zelik KE; Czerniecki JM; Klute GK; Adamczyk PG; Orendurff MS; Hahn ME; Collins SH; Kuo AD
Gait Posture; 2011 Oct; 34(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 21803584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Step-to-step transition work during level and inclined walking using passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses.
Russell Esposito E; Aldridge Whitehead JM; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 25628378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation.
Houdijk H; Wezenberg D; Hak L; Cutti AG
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):76. PubMed ID: 30255807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of walking speed and prosthetic knee control type on external mechanical work in transfemoral prosthesis users.
Pinhey SR; Murata H; Hisano G; Ichimura D; Hobara H; Major MJ
J Biomech; 2022 Mar; 134():110984. PubMed ID: 35182901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM
Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosthetic gait of unilateral lower-limb amputees with current and novel prostheses: A pilot study.
De Pauw K; Serrien B; Baeyens JP; Cherelle P; De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Bailey SP; Lefeber D; Roelands B; Vanderborght B; Meeusen R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():59-67. PubMed ID: 31704536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution of joint work during walking on slopes among persons with transfemoral amputation.
Bonnet X; Villa C; Loiret I; Lavaste F; Pillet H
J Biomech; 2021 Dec; 129():110843. PubMed ID: 34773834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuous relative phases of walking with an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis in individuals with a unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation: an explorative case-control study.
Lathouwers E; Baeyens JP; Tassignon B; Gomez F; Cherelle P; Meeusen R; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K
Biomed Eng Online; 2023 Feb; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 36793091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants.
De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Roelands B; Lefeber D; Meeusen R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29623812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical accommodation to walking with an ankle-foot prosthesis: An exploratory analysis of novice users with transtibial limb loss within the first year of ambulation.
Mahon CE; Hendershot BD
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Oct; 46(5):452-458. PubMed ID: 35333820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross slope gait biomechanics for individuals with and without a unilateral transtibial amputation.
Sinitski E; Baddour N; Gholizadeh H; Besemann M; Dudek N; Lemaire E
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Aug; 98():105734. PubMed ID: 35964385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-to-step transition cost.
Wezenberg D; Cutti AG; Bruno A; Houdijk H
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1579-90. PubMed ID: 25860285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Altering the tuning parameter settings of a commercial powered prosthetic foot to increase power during push-off may not reduce collisional work in the intact limb during gait.
Davidson AM; Childers WL; Chang YH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Oct; 45(5):410-416. PubMed ID: 34469940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic variation of prosthetic foot spring affects center-of-mass mechanics and metabolic cost during walking.
Zelik KE; Collins SH; Adamczyk PG; Segal AD; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Kuo AD
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Aug; 19(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 21708509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation walking with crossover and energy storing prosthetic feet: A randomized within-subject study.
McDonald CL; Kramer PA; Morgan SJ; Halsne EG; Cheever SM; Hafner BJ
Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():349-354. PubMed ID: 29614468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
Zmitrewicz RJ; Neptune RR; Walden JG; Rogers WE; Bosker GW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17023242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing ankle push-off work with a powered prosthesis does not necessarily reduce metabolic rate for transtibial amputees.
Quesada RE; Caputo JM; Collins SH
J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3452-3459. PubMed ID: 27702444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
