These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38244403)

  • 1. Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level.
    Sedran L; Bonnet X; Thomas-Pohl M; Loiret I; Martinet N; Pillet H; Paysant J
    J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111943. PubMed ID: 38244403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees.
    Morgenroth DC; Segal AD; Zelik KE; Czerniecki JM; Klute GK; Adamczyk PG; Orendurff MS; Hahn ME; Collins SH; Kuo AD
    Gait Posture; 2011 Oct; 34(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 21803584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Step-to-step transition work during level and inclined walking using passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses.
    Russell Esposito E; Aldridge Whitehead JM; Wilken JM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 25628378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation.
    Houdijk H; Wezenberg D; Hak L; Cutti AG
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):76. PubMed ID: 30255807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of walking speed and prosthetic knee control type on external mechanical work in transfemoral prosthesis users.
    Pinhey SR; Murata H; Hisano G; Ichimura D; Hobara H; Major MJ
    J Biomech; 2022 Mar; 134():110984. PubMed ID: 35182901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
    Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthetic gait of unilateral lower-limb amputees with current and novel prostheses: A pilot study.
    De Pauw K; Serrien B; Baeyens JP; Cherelle P; De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Bailey SP; Lefeber D; Roelands B; Vanderborght B; Meeusen R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2020 Jan; 71():59-67. PubMed ID: 31704536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distribution of joint work during walking on slopes among persons with transfemoral amputation.
    Bonnet X; Villa C; Loiret I; Lavaste F; Pillet H
    J Biomech; 2021 Dec; 129():110843. PubMed ID: 34773834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous relative phases of walking with an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis in individuals with a unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation: an explorative case-control study.
    Lathouwers E; Baeyens JP; Tassignon B; Gomez F; Cherelle P; Meeusen R; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K
    Biomed Eng Online; 2023 Feb; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 36793091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants.
    De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Roelands B; Lefeber D; Meeusen R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29623812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
    Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical accommodation to walking with an ankle-foot prosthesis: An exploratory analysis of novice users with transtibial limb loss within the first year of ambulation.
    Mahon CE; Hendershot BD
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Oct; 46(5):452-458. PubMed ID: 35333820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross slope gait biomechanics for individuals with and without a unilateral transtibial amputation.
    Sinitski E; Baddour N; Gholizadeh H; Besemann M; Dudek N; Lemaire E
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2022 Aug; 98():105734. PubMed ID: 35964385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-to-step transition cost.
    Wezenberg D; Cutti AG; Bruno A; Houdijk H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1579-90. PubMed ID: 25860285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altering the tuning parameter settings of a commercial powered prosthetic foot to increase power during push-off may not reduce collisional work in the intact limb during gait.
    Davidson AM; Childers WL; Chang YH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Oct; 45(5):410-416. PubMed ID: 34469940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic variation of prosthetic foot spring affects center-of-mass mechanics and metabolic cost during walking.
    Zelik KE; Collins SH; Adamczyk PG; Segal AD; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Kuo AD
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Aug; 19(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 21708509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation walking with crossover and energy storing prosthetic feet: A randomized within-subject study.
    McDonald CL; Kramer PA; Morgan SJ; Halsne EG; Cheever SM; Hafner BJ
    Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():349-354. PubMed ID: 29614468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
    Zmitrewicz RJ; Neptune RR; Walden JG; Rogers WE; Bosker GW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17023242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
    Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing ankle push-off work with a powered prosthesis does not necessarily reduce metabolic rate for transtibial amputees.
    Quesada RE; Caputo JM; Collins SH
    J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3452-3459. PubMed ID: 27702444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.