122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38244923)
21. The role of three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling in grading and differentiating histological subgroups of meningiomas.
Lu Y; Xiong J; Yin B; Wen J; Liu L; Geng D
Clin Radiol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):176-184. PubMed ID: 29031810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Simpson Grade Revisited - Intraoperative Estimation of the Extent of Resection in Meningiomas Versus Postoperative Somatostatin Receptor Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Ueberschaer M; Vettermann FJ; Forbrig R; Unterrainer M; Siller S; Biczok AM; Thorsteinsdottir J; Cyran CC; Bartenstein P; Tonn JC; Albert NL; Schichor C
Neurosurgery; 2020 Dec; 88(1):140-146. PubMed ID: 32827256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. World Health Organization Grade I Convexity Meningiomas: Study on Outcomes, Complications and Recurrence Rates.
Nanda A; Bir SC; Konar S; Maiti TK; Bollam P
World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():620-627.e2. PubMed ID: 26704204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of age on the histological grading of meningiomas.
Park JS; Sade B; Oya S; Kim CG; Lee JH
Neurosurg Rev; 2014 Jul; 37(3):425-9; discussion 429. PubMed ID: 24777642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of MR Morphology and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Meningiomas: Radio-Pathologic Correlation.
Ranabhat K; Bishokarma S; Agrawal P; Shrestha P; Panth R; Ghimire RK
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2019; 57(215):37-44. PubMed ID: 31080244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk of tumor recurrence in intracranial meningiomas: comparative analyses of the predictive value of the postoperative tumor volume and the Simpson classification.
Spille DC; Hess K; Bormann E; Sauerland C; Brokinkel C; Warneke N; Mawrin C; Paulus W; Stummer W; Brokinkel B
J Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 134(6):1764-1771. PubMed ID: 32679565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management.
Gousias K; Schramm J; Simon M
J Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 125(3):551-60. PubMed ID: 26824369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Atypical meningiomas compared to other WHO Grade 2 meningiomas: Histological features and prognosis.
Ajlan A; Almeshari S; Basindwah S; Aljohani M; Alharbi Y; Aldhowaihy F; Alkhaldi H; Alqurashi A
Neurosciences (Riyadh); 2024 May; 29(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 38740393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Can CT and MRI features differentiate benign from malignant meningiomas?
Salah F; Tabbarah A; ALArab Y N; Asmar K; Tamim H; Makki M; Sibahi A; Hourani R
Clin Radiol; 2019 Nov; 74(11):898.e15-898.e23. PubMed ID: 31474303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. MRI predictors for brain invasion in meningiomas.
Ong T; Bharatha A; Alsufayan R; Das S; Lin AW
Neuroradiol J; 2021 Feb; 34(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 32924772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. T1 and ADC histogram parameters may be an in vivo biomarker for predicting the grade, subtype, and proliferative activity of meningioma.
Cao T; Jiang R; Zheng L; Zhang R; Chen X; Wang Z; Jiang P; Chen Y; Zhong T; Chen H; Wu P; Xue Y; Lin L
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):258-269. PubMed ID: 35953734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors after stereotactic radiosurgery for aggressive meningiomas.
Ferraro DJ; Funk RK; Blackett JW; Ju MR; DeWees TA; Chicoine MR; Dowling JL; Rich KM; Drzymala RE; Zoberi I; Simpson JR; Jaboin JJ
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 9():38. PubMed ID: 24467972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Malignant potential of skull base versus non-skull base meningiomas: clinical series of 1,663 cases.
Cornelius JF; Slotty PJ; Steiger HJ; Hänggi D; Polivka M; George B
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Mar; 155(3):407-13. PubMed ID: 23318687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of meningioma from multiparametric MRI for preoperative meningioma differentiation using radiomic features: a multicentre study.
Chen H; Li S; Zhang Y; Liu L; Lv X; Yi Y; Ruan G; Ke C; Feng Y
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):7248-7259. PubMed ID: 35420299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative Analysis of Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading and Assessing Cellular Proliferation of Meningiomas.
Lin L; Bhawana R; Xue Y; Duan Q; Jiang R; Chen H; Chen X; Sun B; Lin H
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Jun; 39(6):1032-1038. PubMed ID: 29748203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. TERT promoter mutation is associated with worse prognosis in WHO grade II and III meningiomas.
Biczok A; Kraus T; Suchorska B; Terpolilli NA; Thorsteinsdottir J; Giese A; Tonn JC; Schichor C
J Neurooncol; 2018 Sep; 139(3):671-678. PubMed ID: 29808339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ki-67 proliferative index predicts clinical outcome in patients with atypical or anaplastic meningioma.
Bruna J; Brell M; Ferrer I; Gimenez-Bonafe P; Tortosa A
Neuropathology; 2007 Apr; 27(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 17494511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validation of a scoring system to evaluate the risk of rapid growth of intracranial meningiomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients.
Abi Jaoude S; Peyre M; Degos V; Goutagny S; Parfait B; Kalamarides M
J Neurosurg; 2020 May; 134(5):1377-1385. PubMed ID: 32442973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A radiopathological classification of dural tail sign of meningiomas.
Qi ST; Liu Y; Pan J; Chotai S; Fang LX
J Neurosurg; 2012 Oct; 117(4):645-53. PubMed ID: 22839654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Value of KI-67/MIB-1 labeling index and simpson grading system to predict the recurrence of who grade I intracranial meningiomas compared to who grade II.
Prat-Acín R; Guarín-Corredor MJ; Galeano-Senabre I; Ayuso-Sacido A; Vera-Sempere F
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 86():32-37. PubMed ID: 33775343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
