123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38245407)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guided focal cryoablation for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Sidana A; Tayebi S; Blank F; Lama DJ; Meyer M; Saeed Y; Tobler J; Hsu WW; Verma S
Urol Oncol; 2024 May; 42(5):158.e1-158.e10. PubMed ID: 38245407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemigland Cryoablation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Intermediate-Term Followup via Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy.
Chuang R; Kinnaird A; Kwan L; Sisk A; Barsa D; Felker E; Delfin M; Marks L
J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):941-949. PubMed ID: 32985924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncological Outcome and Value of Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Focal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy for Prostate Cancer.
Rosenhammer B; Niessen C; Rotzinger L; Reiss J; Schnabel MJ; Burger M; Bründl J
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):270-278. PubMed ID: 31466073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Focal Cryoablation of Image-Localized Prostate Cancer.
Arcot R; Potts BA; Polascik TJ
J Endourol; 2021 Sep; 35(S2):S17-S23. PubMed ID: 34499551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer treatment by the latest focal HIFU device with MRI/TRUS-fusion control biopsies: A prospective evaluation.
von Hardenberg J; Westhoff N; Baumunk D; Hausmann D; Martini T; Marx A; Porubsky S; Schostak M; Michel MS; Ritter M
Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 36(9):401.e1-401.e9. PubMed ID: 30093211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Focal cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: a single institute's perspective.
Hale Z; Miyake M; Palacios DA; Rosser CJ
BMC Urol; 2013 Jan; 13():2. PubMed ID: 23311921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single center experience with third-generation cryosurgery for management of organ-confined prostate cancer: critical evaluation of short-term outcomes, complications, and patient quality of life.
Hubosky SG; Fabrizio MD; Schellhammer PF; Barone BB; Tepera CM; Given RW
J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1521-31. PubMed ID: 18186694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion focal cryotherapy of the prostate: A prospective development study.
Valerio M; Shah TT; Shah P; Mccartan N; Emberton M; Arya M; Ahmed HU
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):150.e1-150.e7. PubMed ID: 27955940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phase II Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer.
Eggener SE; Yousuf A; Watson S; Wang S; Oto A
J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1670-1675. PubMed ID: 27449263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for the localized prostate cancer for Asian based on the localization with MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided transperineal biopsy and 12-cores transperineal systematic biopsy: prospective analysis of oncological and functional outcomes.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Uemura K; Nitta M; Hasegawa M; Kawamura Y; Hashida K; Hasebe T; Tajiri T; Miyajima A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 25(10):1844-1853. PubMed ID: 32556840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel Automated Three-Dimensional Surgical Planning Tool and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Technology to Perform Nanoparticle Ablation and Cryoablation of the Prostate for Focal Therapy.
Jue JS; Coons S; Hautvast G; Thompson SF; Geraats J; Richstone L; Schwartz MJ; Rastinehad AR
J Endourol; 2022 Mar; 36(3):369-372. PubMed ID: 34409850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Current status and future prospective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: development of multiparametric MRI, MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided biopsy, and treatment modalities.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Hanada I; Kim H; Nitta M; Hasegawa M; Kawamura Y; Hashida K; Tajiri T; Miyajima A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 25(4):509-520. PubMed ID: 32040781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.
Woodrum DA; Kawashima A; Gorny KR; Mynderse LA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):877-88. PubMed ID: 26907717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of post-ablation mpMRI as a predictor of residual prostate cancer after focal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation.
Khandwala YS; Morisetty S; Ghanouni P; Fan RE; Soerensen SJC; Rusu M; Sonn GA
Urol Oncol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):489.e9-489.e17. PubMed ID: 36058811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does mpMRI guidance improve HIFU partial gland ablation compared to conventional ultrasound guidance? Early functional outcomes and complications from a single center.
Sivaraman A; Marra G; Stabile A; Mombet A; Macek P; Lanz C; Cathala N; Moschini M; Carneiro A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
Int Braz J Urol; 2020; 46(6):984-992. PubMed ID: 32822127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medium-term Oncological Efficacy and Patient-reported Outcomes After Focal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound: The FOXPRO Trial.
Westhoff N; Ernst R; Kowalewski KF; Derigs F; Neuberger M; Nörenberg D; Popovic ZV; Ritter M; Stephan Michel M; von Hardenberg J
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):283-290. PubMed ID: 36344395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
