143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38245617)
21. Unicortical and bicortical plating in the fixation of comminuted fractures of the clavicle: a biomechanical study.
Looft JM; Corrêa L; Patel M; Rawlings M; Ackland DC
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Nov; 87(11):915-920. PubMed ID: 28922701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Unicortical versus bicortical locked plate fixation in midshaft clavicle fractures.
Bravman JT; Taylor ML; Baldini T; Vidal AF
Orthopedics; 2015 May; 38(5):e411-6. PubMed ID: 25970369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Finite element analysis of locking plate and two types of intramedullary nails for treating mid-shaft clavicle fractures.
Ni M; Niu W; Wong DW; Zeng W; Mei J; Zhang M
Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1618-23. PubMed ID: 27311550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical Comparison of Bicortical, Unicortical, and Unicortical Far-Cortex-Abutting Screw Fixations in Plated Comminuted Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.
Croley JS; Morris RP; Amin A; Lindsey RW; Gugala Z
J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jun; 41(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 27113909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Osteosynthesis of type III acromial fractures with locking compression plate, lateral clavicular plate, and reconstruction plate: a biomechanical analysis of load to failure and strain distribution.
Kicinski M; Puskas GJ; Zdravkovic V; Jost B
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2093-2098. PubMed ID: 29996981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Study on the characteristics of increased mechanical stiffness according to changes in LCP shape to reinforce clavicle fractures.
Kim SM; Kim ST; Han DW; Kim DG
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6382. PubMed ID: 38493231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Single versus dual orthogonal plating for comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures: a biomechanics study.
Boyce GN; Philpott AJ; Ackland DC; Ek ET
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jul; 15(1):248. PubMed ID: 32646450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical evaluation of clavicle fracture plating techniques: does a locking plate provide improved stability?
Celestre P; Roberston C; Mahar A; Oka R; Meunier M; Schwartz A
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Apr; 22(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 18404033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative analysis of a locking plate with an all-suture anchor versus hook plate fixation of Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures.
Seo JB; Kwak KY; Yoo JS
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(3):2309499020962260. PubMed ID: 33118439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A biomechanical comparison of superior and anterior positioning of precontoured plates for midshaft clavicle fractures.
Toogood P; Coughlin D; Rodriguez D; Lotz J; Feeley B
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Oct; 43(10):E226-31. PubMed ID: 25303449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conceptual finite element study for comparison among superior, anterior, and spiral clavicle plate fixations for midshaft clavicle fracture.
Huang TL; Chen WC; Lin KJ; Tsai CL; Lin KP; Wei HW
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Oct; 38(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 27423702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?
Stoffel K; Dieter U; Stachowiak G; Gächter A; Kuster MS
Injury; 2003 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():B11-9. PubMed ID: 14580982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Displaced medial clavicle fractures: operative treatment with locking compression plate fixation.
Frima H; Houwert RM; Sommer C
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2020 Feb; 46(1):207-213. PubMed ID: 30310957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius.
Uhl JM; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):840-6. PubMed ID: 24033354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Superior versus anteroinferior plating of the clavicle: a finite element study.
Favre P; Kloen P; Helfet DL; Werner CM
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Nov; 25(11):661-5. PubMed ID: 21904229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Plate Configurations for Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Fixation: Single Plating Compared with Dual Mini-Fragment Plating.
Kitzen J; Paulson K; Korley R; Duffy P; Martin CR; Schneider PS
JB JS Open Access; 2022; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 35265785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A biomechanical comparison of two plating techniques in lateral clavicle fractures.
Suter C; von Rohr M; Majewski M; Dürselen L; Warnecke D; Schild N; Nowakowski AM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Jul; 67():78-84. PubMed ID: 31077979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures.
Eckel TT; Glisson RR; Anand P; Parekh SG
Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Nov; 34(11):1588-95. PubMed ID: 23818460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Finite element analysis comparison of Type 42A2 fracture fixed with external titanium alloy locking plate and traditional external fixation frame.
Fang S; Zhang L; Yang Y; Wang Y; Guo J; Mi L
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Oct; 18(1):815. PubMed ID: 37907959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical evaluation of two innovative locking implants for comminuted olecranon fractures under high-cycle loading conditions.
Wagner FC; Konstantinidis L; Hohloch N; Hohloch L; Suedkamp NP; Reising K
Injury; 2015; 46(6):985-9. PubMed ID: 25771445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
