These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38246309)

  • 1. Impact of scanning distance on the accuracy of a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Drone M; Barmak AB; Guinot-Barona C; Att W; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104854. PubMed ID: 38246309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of implant reference on the scanning accuracy of complete arch implant scans captured by using a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Drone M; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38267350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Rubenstein J; Methani MM; Piedra-Cascón W; Özcan M; Att W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):160-165. PubMed ID: 34154820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study.
    Lawand G; Ismail Y; Revilla-León M; Tohme H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 35864021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ortega R; Sallorenzo A; Agustín-Panadero R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104307. PubMed ID: 36162637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry.
    Cheng J; Zhang H; Liu H; Li J; Wang HL; Tao X
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 May; 35(5):560-572. PubMed ID: 38421115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting.
    Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations.
    Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Sallorenzo A; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 35337658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy of photogrammetry and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an
    Sun YJ; Ma BW; Yue XX; Lin X; Geng W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):168-172. PubMed ID: 35152653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study.
    Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Cascos R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jun; 34(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 37052054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of implant location and operator on the accuracy of implant scans using a combined healing abutment-scan body system.
    Atalay S; Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103855. PubMed ID: 34688778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.