122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38246806)
1. Clinical parameters for the prediction of occult lymph node metastasis in patients with negative PSMA-PET.
Huebner NA; Wasinger G; Rajwa P; Resch I; Korn S; Rasul S; Baltzer P; Prüger L; Rauschmeier A; Seitz C; Comperat E; Shariat SF; Grubmüller B
Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 42(4):115.e9-115.e16. PubMed ID: 38246806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distribution of prostate cancer recurrences on gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (
Huits TH; Luiting HB; van der Poel HG; Nandurkar R; Donswijk M; Schaake E; Vogel W; Roobol MJ; Wit E; Stricker P; Emmett L; van Leeuwen PJ
BJU Int; 2020 Jun; 125(6):876-883. PubMed ID: 32181951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic accuracy of
Rajwa P; Heidenreich J; Drzezga A; Schmidt M; Shariat SF; Heidenreich A
Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 37750292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rational use of Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT according to nomograms and risk groups for the detection of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Madendere S; Kılıç M; Köseoğlu E; Aykanat İC; Eden AB; Coşkun B; Tekkalan FB; Balbay MD
Urol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):29.e9-29.e15. PubMed ID: 38114351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Ferraro DA; Muehlematter UJ; Garcia Schüler HI; Rupp NJ; Huellner M; Messerli M; Rüschoff JH; Ter Voert EEGW; Hermanns T; Burger IA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jan; 47(1):147-159. PubMed ID: 31522272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of
Zhang Q; Zang S; Zhang C; Fu Y; Lv X; Zhang Q; Deng Y; Zhang C; Luo R; Zhao X; Wang W; Wang F; Guo H
J Transl Med; 2017 Nov; 15(1):230. PubMed ID: 29115970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Esen T; Falay O; Tarim K; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Kilic M; Seymen H; Sarikaya AF; Kiremit MC; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Baydar DE; Kordan Y; Demirkol MO; Tilki D
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 33509671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of the performance of [
Abufaraj M; Grubmüller B; Zeitlinger M; Kramer G; Seitz C; Haitel A; Baltzer P; Hacker M; Wadsak W; Pfaff S; Wiatr T; Mitterhauser M; Shariat SF; Hartenbach M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Sep; 46(10):2169-2177. PubMed ID: 31254037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT as a predictor of biochemical persistence and early recurrence following radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection.
Baas DJH; Schilham M; Hermsen R; de Baaij JMS; Vrijhof HJEJ; Hoekstra RJ; Sedelaar JPM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Gotthardt M; Wijers CHW; van Basten JP; Somford DM
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Mar; 25(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 34471231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (
van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk M; Nandurkar R; Stricker P; Ho B; Heijmink S; Wit EMK; Tillier C; van Muilenkom E; Nguyen Q; van der Poel HG; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 30074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical parameters and nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis detected with
Onal C; Ozyigit G; Oymak E; Guler OC; Hurmuz P; Tilki B; Reyhan M; Tuncel M; Akyol F
Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):648-656. PubMed ID: 33949694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
Li TC; Wang Y; Xiao CT; Li MZ; Liu XP; Huang WT; Li LY; Li K; Di JM; Wen XQ; Gao X
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 34213490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PSMA PET Scan Era: A Changing Paradigm PSMA PET and Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer Management.
Haxhimolla J; Kua B; Gilbourd D; Haxhimolla H
Semin Oncol Nurs; 2020 Aug; 36(4):151044. PubMed ID: 32723519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
