These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38247175)

  • 21. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cognitive and electrophysiological correlates of the bilingual stroop effect.
    Naylor LJ; Stanley EM; Wicha NY
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():81. PubMed ID: 22485099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Both task-irrelevant and task-relevant information trigger reactive conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Morton JB; Lupker SJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2133-2145. PubMed ID: 35768659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Presentation of multiple task instructional sets impacts auditory Stroop performance during dual task locomotion.
    Pitman J; Kissack B; Vallis LA
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Oct; 242(10):2357-2365. PubMed ID: 39110163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proactive control affects task conflict beyond contingency learning.
    Keha E; Kalanthroff E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Nov; ():17470218231210533. PubMed ID: 37864484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Activation of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex due to task-related interference in an auditory Stroop paradigm.
    Haupt S; Axmacher N; Cohen MX; Elger CE; Fell J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):3043-56. PubMed ID: 19180558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?
    Parris BA; Hasshim N; Ferrand L; Augustinova M
    J Cogn; 2023; 6(1):23. PubMed ID: 37152834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stimulus and response conflict from a second language: Stroop interference in weakly-bilingual and recently-trained languages.
    Šaban I; Schmidt JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jul; 218():103360. PubMed ID: 34218077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 32150437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is "conflict adaptation" driven by conflict? Behavioral and EEG evidence for the underappreciated role of congruent trials.
    Compton RJ; Huber E; Levinson AR; Zheutlin A
    Psychophysiology; 2012 May; 49(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 22332754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task.
    Kalanthroff E; Davelaar EJ; Henik A; Goldfarb L; Usher M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):59-82. PubMed ID: 29035077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence for Two Types of Task Conflict in a Color-Digit Stroop Task.
    Hershman R; Keha E; Sapir A; Weiss EM; Henik A; Kaufmann L
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):54. PubMed ID: 39005951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The selective use of punishments on congruent versus incongruent trials in the Stroop task.
    Yang Q; Xing J; Braem S; Pourtois G
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Sep; 193():107654. PubMed ID: 35777632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multimodal Simon Effect: A Multimodal Extension of the Diffusion Model for Conflict Tasks.
    Mahani MN; Bausenhart KM; Ahmadabadi MN; Ulrich R
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():507. PubMed ID: 30687039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Resting Stroop task: Evidence of task conflict in trials with no required response.
    Hershman R; Dadon G; Kiesel A; Henik A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):353-360. PubMed ID: 37620635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conflict modification: predictable production of congruent situations facilitates responding in a stroop task.
    Schmidts C; Foerster A; Kunde W
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1722-1732. PubMed ID: 29679142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.