219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38250014)
1. Echoendoscopic ultrasound pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis and theranostic approach: should
Béchade D; Palmieri LJ; Bonhomme B; Pernot S; Léna J; Fonck M; Pesqué S; Boillet G; Italiano A; Roseau G
Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2024; 17():17562848231224943. PubMed ID: 38250014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB.
Gan Q; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Duose DY; Stewart JM; Coronel E; Bhutani MS; Lee JH; Weston B; Ge PS; Ross WA; Maitra A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 130(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 34905283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. KRAS mutation testing on all non-malignant diagnosis of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies improves diagnostic accuracy.
Trisolini E; Armellini E; Paganotti A; Veggiani C; Bozzola C; Frattini M; Pizio C; Mancuso G; Andorno S; Boldorini R
Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):379-386. PubMed ID: 28450086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliable Detection of Somatic Mutations for Pancreatic Cancer in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspirates with Next-Generation Sequencing: Implications from a Prospective Cohort Study.
Habib JR; Zhu Y; Yin L; Javed AA; Ding D; Tenior J; Wright M; Ali SZ; Burkhart RA; Burns W; Wolfgang CL; Shin E; Yu J; He J
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Dec; 25(12):3149-3159. PubMed ID: 34244950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Tissue Sampling Adequacy for Molecular Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Mohamed WT; Jahagirdar V; Jaber F; Ahmed MK; Fatima I; Bierman T; Fu Z; Jones PG; Hassan AF; Faber E; Clarkston WK; Ghoz H; Tawfik OW; Jonnalagadda S
Cancers (Basel); 2024 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 38398152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition methods for genomic analysis of pancreatic cancer.
Elhanafi S; Mahmud N; Vergara N; Kochman ML; Das KK; Ginsberg GG; Rajala M; Chandrasekhara V
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 34(5):907-913. PubMed ID: 30422342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Targeted Transcriptome and
Lundy J; Gao H; Berry W; Masoumi-Moghoddam S; Jenkins BJ; Croagh D
Clin Cancer Res; 2021 Nov; 27(21):5900-5911. PubMed ID: 34400416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. KRAS Mutation Testing on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Samples Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Pancreatic Cancer.
Yeung MCF; Shek TWH
Pancreas; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 51(10):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 37099780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprehensive molecular profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in FNA, biopsy, and resection specimens.
Razzano D; Bouza SJ; Hernandez PV; Wang M; Robert ME; Walther Z; Cai G
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Sep; 130(9):726-734. PubMed ID: 35511415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle biopsy with histology specimen processing.
Ku L; Shahshahan MA; Hou LA; Eysselein VE; Reicher S
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Aug; 12(8):212-219. PubMed ID: 32879656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver agreement and accuracy of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy for histological grading of pancreatic cancer.
Larghi A; Correale L; Ricci R; Abdulkader I; Monges G; Iglesias-Garcia J; Giovannini M; Attili F; Vitale G; Hassan C; Costamagna G; Rindi G
Endoscopy; 2015 Apr; 47(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 25521572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Crinò SF; Ammendola S; Meneghetti A; Bernardoni L; Conti Bellocchi MC; Gabbrielli A; Landoni L; Paiella S; Pin F; Parisi A; Mastrosimini MG; Amodio A; Frulloni L; Facciorusso A; Larghi A; Manfrin E
Pancreatology; 2021 Mar; 21(2):443-450. PubMed ID: 33390343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction detection of KRAS mutations in pancreatic FNA samples: Technical and practical aspects for routine clinical implementation.
Mansour Y; Boubaddi M; Odion T; Marty M; Belleannée G; Berger A; Subtil C; Laurent C; Dabernat S; Amintas S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2024 May; 132(5):274-284. PubMed ID: 38308613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
