These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38250504)

  • 1. Are the Steps on Likert Scales Equidistant? Responses on Visual Analog Scales Allow Estimating Their Distances.
    García-Pérez MA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Feb; 84(1):91-122. PubMed ID: 38250504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.
    Xiao Y; Liu H; Li H
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():806. PubMed ID: 28572781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric properties of self-report concussion scales and checklists.
    McLeod TC; Leach C
    J Athl Train; 2012; 47(2):221-3. PubMed ID: 22488289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the variability of personality traits with interval responses: Psychometric properties of the dual-range slider response format : Measuring variability with interval responses.
    Kloft M; Snijder JP; Heck DW
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3469-3486. PubMed ID: 38609729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the Factor Structure of Psychological Scales: The Expanded Format as an Alternative to the Likert Scale Format.
    Zhang X; Savalei V
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 76(3):357-386. PubMed ID: 27182074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief - Likert format: Factor structure analysis in general population in France].
    Ferchiou A; Todorov L; Lajnef M; Baudin G; Pignon B; Richard JR; Leboyer M; Szöke A; Schürhoff F
    Encephale; 2017 Dec; 43(6):558-563. PubMed ID: 27644915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved Properties of the Big Five Inventory and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the Expanded Format Relative to the Likert Format.
    Zhang X; Tse WW; Savalei V
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1286. PubMed ID: 31214090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive Visual Analog Scales (AVAS): a modifiable software program for the creation, administration, and scoring of visual analog scales.
    Marsh-Richard DM; Hatzis ES; Mathias CW; Venditti N; Dougherty DM
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 19182128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix Validity of Likert Scales Via Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Flamer S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1983 Jul; 18(3):275-306. PubMed ID: 26744917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a visual analog scale form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual function questionnaire 12.
    Occhino JA; Trabuco EC; Heisler CA; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2011 Sep; 17(5):246-8. PubMed ID: 22453109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual analogue scales for mode-independent measurement in self-administered questionnaires.
    Gerich J
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 Nov; 39(4):985-92. PubMed ID: 18183916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A manic-depressive symptom self-report in optical scanable format.
    Glick HA; McBride L; Bauer MS
    Bipolar Disord; 2003 Oct; 5(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 14525558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of unweighted and item response theory-based weighted sum scoring for the Nine-Questions Depression-Rating Scale in the Northern Thai Dialect.
    Kawilapat S; Maneeton B; Maneeton N; Prasitwattanaseree S; Kongsuk T; Arunpongpaisal S; Leejongpermpoon J; Sukhawaha S; Traisathit P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):268. PubMed ID: 36224520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and precision of responses to visual analog scales: Inter- and intra-individual variability.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4369-4381. PubMed ID: 36396834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement.
    Sung YT; Wu JS
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1694-1715. PubMed ID: 29667082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the Psychometric Properties of a Scale Across Three Likert and Three Alternative Formats: An Application to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
    Zhang X; Zhou L; Savalei V
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Aug; 83(4):649-683. PubMed ID: 37398842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to ask about patient satisfaction? The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale.
    Voutilainen A; Pitkäaho T; Kvist T; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K
    J Adv Nurs; 2016 Apr; 72(4):946-57. PubMed ID: 26689434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preconditions for sensitivity in measuring change: visual analogue scales compared to rating scales in a Likert format.
    Pfennings L; Cohen L; van der Ploeg H
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Oct; 77(2):475-80. PubMed ID: 8559872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changing the Scale: The Effect of Modifying Response Scale Labels on the Measurement of Personality and Affect.
    Steinberg L; Rogers A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 32876478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.
    Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V; Nieto MD; Morillo D
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2309. PubMed ID: 31681103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.