These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38250507)

  • 1. The Impact of Measurement Model Misspecification on Coefficient Omega Estimates of Composite Reliability.
    Bell SM; Chalmers RP; Flora DB
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Feb; 84(1):5-39. PubMed ID: 38250507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability Estimation in Multidimensional Scales: Comparing the Bias of Six Estimators in Measures With a Bifactor Structure.
    Trizano-Hermosilla I; Gálvez-Nieto JL; Alvarado JM; Saiz JL; Salvo-Garrido S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():508287. PubMed ID: 34248723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Composite Reliability Estimators: Coefficient Omega Confidence Intervals in the Current Literature.
    Padilla MA; Divers J
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 76(3):436-453. PubMed ID: 29795872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling Measurement Errors of the Exogenous Composites From Congeneric Measures in Interaction Models.
    Hsiao YY; Kwok OM; Lai MHC
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2021; 28(2):250-260. PubMed ID: 34239281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Simulation Study on the Performance of Different Reliability Estimation Methods.
    Edwards AA; Joyner KJ; Schatschneider C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Dec; 81(6):1089-1117. PubMed ID: 34565817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and omega hierarchical in multidimensional data: A comparison of various estimators.
    Cho E
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 36048053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for population reliability coefficients: Evaluation of methods, recommendations, and software for composite measures.
    Kelley K; Pornprasertmanit S
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):69-92. PubMed ID: 26962759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensionality and reliability of the self-care of heart failure index scales: further evidence from confirmatory factor analysis.
    Barbaranelli C; Lee CS; Vellone E; Riegel B
    Res Nurs Health; 2014 Dec; 37(6):524-37. PubMed ID: 25324013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.
    Terluin B; Smits N; Brouwers EP; de Vet HC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Sep; 14(1):130. PubMed ID: 27629535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factor structure of the 10-item CES-D Scale among patients with persistent COVID-19.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; Olabarrieta-Landa L; Rivera D; Izquierdo M
    J Med Virol; 2023 Jan; 95(1):e28236. PubMed ID: 36258275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing Essential Unidimensionality of Scales and Structural Coefficient Bias.
    Liu X; Cao P; Lai X; Wen J; Yang Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Feb; 83(1):28-47. PubMed ID: 36601253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.
    Rodriguez A; Reise SP; Haviland MG
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 26523435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construct validity and factor structure of the Kessler-10 in South Africa.
    Hoffman J; Cossie Q; Ametaj AA; Kim HH; James R; Stroud RE; Stevenson A; Zingela Z; Stein DJ; Gelaye B
    BMC Psychol; 2022 Jul; 10(1):177. PubMed ID: 35851071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring PROMIS pain interference in German patients with chronic conditions: calibration, validation, and cross-cultural use of item parameters.
    Obbarius A; Klapproth CP; Liegl G; Christmann PM; Schneider U; Fischer F; Rose M
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Oct; 32(10):2839-2852. PubMed ID: 37268754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viability of a MSQOL-54 general health-related quality of life score using bifactor model.
    Giordano A; Testa S; Bassi M; Cilia S; Bertolotto A; Quartuccio ME; Pietrolongo E; Falautano M; Grobberio M; Niccolai C; Allegri B; Viterbo RG; Confalonieri P; Giovannetti AM; Cocco E; Grasso MG; Lugaresi A; Ferriani E; Nocentini U; Zaffaroni M; De Livera A; Jelinek G; Solari A; Rosato R
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Sep; 19(1):224. PubMed ID: 34563229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: from alpha to omega.
    Watkins MW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017; 31(6-7):1113-1126. PubMed ID: 28429633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bifactor structure and model reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development - 3rd edition.
    Garn AC; Webster EK
    J Sci Med Sport; 2021 Jan; 24(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 32919885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification.
    Rhemtulla M
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):348-368. PubMed ID: 26828780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bifactor Modeling and the Estimation of Model-Based Reliability in the WAIS-IV.
    Gignac GE; Watkins MW
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Sep; 48(5):639-62. PubMed ID: 26741057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cautionary note on the finite sample behavior of maximal reliability.
    Aguirre-Urreta MI; Rönkkö M; McIntosh CN
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):236-252. PubMed ID: 30138004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.