161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38251975)
1. Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Uterine Cervix (AIS) Treated by Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Strategy: An Observational Study.
Soegaard-Andersen E; Frandsen AP; Sandahl P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2024 Apr; 28(2):149-152. PubMed ID: 38251975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical significance of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in diagnosis and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma].
Song Y; Wang Q; Sui L; Gao SJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 29609232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.
Cohen PA; Brand A; Sykes P; Wrede DCH; McNally O; Eva L; Rao A; Campion M; Stockler M; Powell A; Codde J; Bulsara MK; Anderson L; Leung Y; Farrell L; Stoyles P
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017576. PubMed ID: 28851799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Syringe or mask? Loop electrosurgical excision procedure under local or general anesthesia: a randomized trial.
Rezniczek GA; Hecken JM; Rehman S; Dogan A; Tempfer CB; Hilal Z
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):888.e1-888.e9. PubMed ID: 32585223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Management and long-term outcomes of women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: A retrospective study.
Tan JHJ; Malloy MJ; Thangamani R; Gertig D; Drennan KT; Wrede CD; Saville M; Quinn M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 31578727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical Screening Results Leading to Detection of Adenocarcinoma in Situ of the Uterine Cervix.
Srisomboon S; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):377-382. PubMed ID: 30803195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by conization.
Taylor JS; Panico V; Caputo T; Gerber D; Gupta D; Pirog E; Holcomb K
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 25556268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?
Munro A; Leung Y; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Semmens J; Codde J; Williams V; O'Leary P; Steel N; Cohen P
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 25769659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Hiramatsu K; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23395556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conservative Treatment for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ: Long-Term Results.
Monti E; Somigliana E; Alberico D; Boero V; Iorio M; Di Loreto E; Dell'acqua A; Liverani CA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Oct; 26(4):293-297. PubMed ID: 35917498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Kim JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jul; 145(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 19428171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of persistent or recurrent neoplasia in conservatively treated women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative histological margins.
Munro A; Codde J; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Semmens JB; Cohen PA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28181670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
Bogani G; DI Donato V; Sopracordevole F; Ciavattini A; Ghelardi A; Lopez S; Simoncini T; Plotti F; Casarin J; Serati M; Pinelli C; Valenti G; Bergamini A; Gardella B; Dell'acqua A; Monti E; Vercellini P; Fischetti M; D'Ippolito G; Aguzzoli L; Mandato VD; Carunchio P; Carlinfante G; Giannella L; Scaffa C; Falcone F; Borghi C; Ditto A; Malzoni M; Giannini A; Salerno MG; Liberale V; Contino B; Donfrancesco C; Desiato M; Perrone AM; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Ferrero S; Sarpietro G; Matarazzo MG; Cianci A; Bosio S; Ruisi S; Guerrisi R; Brusadelli C; Mosca L; Tinelli R; DE Vincenzo R; Zannoni GF; Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Dessole S; Angioli R; Greggi S; Spinillo A; Ghezzi F; Colacurci N; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):636-641. PubMed ID: 32893030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jiang Y; Chen C; Li L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170587. PubMed ID: 28125627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
