220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38252469)
21. Machine learning in predicting graft failure following kidney transplantation: A systematic review of published predictive models.
Senanayake S; White N; Graves N; Healy H; Baboolal K; Kularatna S
Int J Med Inform; 2019 Oct; 130():103957. PubMed ID: 31472443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Value of Applying Machine Learning in Predicting the Time of Symptom Onset in Stroke Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Feng J; Zhang Q; Wu F; Peng J; Li Z; Chen Z
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e44895. PubMed ID: 37824198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu J; Lei J; Ou Y; Zhao Y; Tuo X; Zhang B; Shen M
Clin Exp Med; 2023 Oct; 23(6):2341-2356. PubMed ID: 36242643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction of hypertension using traditional regression and machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chowdhury MZI; Naeem I; Quan H; Leung AA; Sikdar KC; O'Beirne M; Turin TC
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266334. PubMed ID: 35390039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A systematic review of predictive models for hospital-acquired pressure injury using machine learning.
Zhou Y; Yang X; Ma S; Yuan Y; Yan M
Nurs Open; 2023 Mar; 10(3):1234-1246. PubMed ID: 36310417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine learning for predicting hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu Y; Zhao F; Niu E; Chen L
Neuroradiology; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38862772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Machine learning in the prediction of immunotherapy response and prognosis of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li J; Dan K; Ai J
Front Immunol; 2024; 15():1281940. PubMed ID: 38835779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Xie Q; Wang X; Pei J; Wu Y; Guo Q; Su Y; Yan H; Nan R; Chen H; Dou X
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2022 Oct; 23(10):1655-1668.e6. PubMed ID: 35922015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting Ovarian Cancer Patients' Clinical Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy by Their Tumor Proteomic Signatures.
Yu KH; Levine DA; Zhang H; Chan DW; Zhang Z; Snyder M
J Proteome Res; 2016 Aug; 15(8):2455-65. PubMed ID: 27312948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The predictive effect of different machine learning algorithms for pressure injuries in hospitalized patients: A network meta-analyses.
Qu C; Luo W; Zeng Z; Lin X; Gong X; Wang X; Zhang Y; Li Y
Heliyon; 2022 Nov; 8(11):e11361. PubMed ID: 36387440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Prediction of platinum-based chemotherapy sensitivity for epithelial ovarian cancer by multi-sequence MRI-based radiomic nomogram].
Mao MM; Li HM; Shi J; Qiu QS; Feng F
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 102(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 35042289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Platinum Sensitivity of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.
Hwangbo S; Kim SI; Kim JH; Eoh KJ; Lee C; Kim YT; Suh DS; Park T; Song YS
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Apr; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 33919797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Meta-analysis of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) association with response to platinum- based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.
Li FY; Ren XB; Xie XY; Zhang J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(12):7203-6. PubMed ID: 24460276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The predictive value of machine learning for mortality risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang X; Wang X; Xu L; Liu J; Ren P; Wu H
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Oct; 28(1):451. PubMed ID: 37864271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Machine learning-based prediction models for pressure injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pei J; Guo X; Tao H; Wei Y; Zhang H; Ma Y; Han L
Int Wound J; 2023 Dec; 20(10):4328-4339. PubMed ID: 37340520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The application of risk models based on machine learning to predict endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer in patients with endometriosis.
Chao X; Wang S; Lang J; Leng J; Fan Q
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Dec; 101(12):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 36210724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of Artificial Intelligence for Preoperative Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Blood Biomarkers.
Kawakami E; Tabata J; Yanaihara N; Ishikawa T; Koseki K; Iida Y; Saito M; Komazaki H; Shapiro JS; Goto C; Akiyama Y; Saito R; Saito M; Takano H; Yamada K; Okamoto A
Clin Cancer Res; 2019 May; 25(10):3006-3015. PubMed ID: 30979733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Association of Sodium Thiosulfate With Risk of Ototoxic Effects From Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Chen CH; Huang CY; Lin HH; Wang MC; Chang CY; Cheng YF
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2118895. PubMed ID: 34338793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature.
Huang Y; Talwar A; Chatterjee S; Aparasu RR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33952192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
