BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38252678)

  • 1. Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Singh S; Mohan BP; Chandan S; Sharma N; Vinayek R; Dutta S; Kantsevoy SV; Le M; Adler DG
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38252678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term outcomes of traction-assisted versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
    Xia M; Zhou Y; Yu J; Chen W; Huang X; Liao J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 17(1):94. PubMed ID: 31164139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces procedure time and risk of serious adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lopimpisuth C; Simons M; Akshintala VS; Prasongdee K; Nanavati J; Ngamruengphong S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1775-1788. PubMed ID: 33825013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Different Methods of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Wu X; Ye C; Cao Z; Hu X; Pan W; Jing J
    Dig Dis; 2022; 40(6):796-809. PubMed ID: 34937035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional Versus Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal, Gastric, and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Giacobo Nunes F; Gomes ILC; De Moura DTH; Dominguez JEG; Fornari F; Ribeiro IB; Peixoto de Oliveira GH; de Figueiredo SMP; Bernardo WM; Hourneaux de Moura EG
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55645. PubMed ID: 38586623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Complex Colorectal Lesions.
    Singh S; Mohan BP; Vinayek R; Dutta S; Dahiya DS; Gangwani MK; Suresh Kumar VC; Aswath G; Bhat I; Inamdar S; Sharma N; Adler DG
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38567896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of a Traction Device for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using a Scissor-Type Knife: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Tamaru Y; Kuwai T; Miyakawa A; Kanazawa N; Kusunoki R; Shimura H; Uchiyama S; Ishaq S; Kohno H
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2022 Nov; 117(11):1797-1804. PubMed ID: 36191269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang T; Zhang H; Zhong F; Wang X
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 32856152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter randomized control study of the efficacy of SO clip in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). (SO clip study in colorectal ESD): Randomized controlled trial.
    Taki S; Iguchi M; Fukatsu K; Shimokawa T; Kinoshita I; Syunsuke O; Maekita T; Kinoshita J; Takao M; Kitano M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 May; 102(19):e33756. PubMed ID: 37171336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective clinical trial of traction device-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of large superficial colorectal tumors using the S-O clip.
    Ritsuno H; Sakamoto N; Osada T; Goto SP; Murakami T; Ueyama H; Mori H; Matsumoto K; Beppu K; Shibuya T; Nagahara A; Ogihara T; Watanabe S
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Nov; 28(11):3143-9. PubMed ID: 24879138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions.
    Arezzo A; Passera R; Marchese N; Galloro G; Manta R; Cirocchi R
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Feb; 4(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 26966519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis.
    Pei Q; Qiao H; Zhang M; Wang G; Feng H; Pan J; Shi Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 May; 93(5):1038-1046.e4. PubMed ID: 33484729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel single-operator through-the-scope traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection: Outcomes of a multicenter randomized pilot ex-vivo study in trainees with limited endoscopic submucosal dissection experience (with video).
    Yang D; Aihara H; Hasan MK; Simsek C; Khan H; Brar TS; Gorrepati VS; Forde JJ; Kadkhodayan K; Arain MA; Draganov PV
    DEN Open; 2023 Apr; 3(1):e174. PubMed ID: 36247316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of dental floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosa dissection to rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm].
    Shi Q; Sun D; Zhong YS; Xu MD; Li B; Cai SL; Qi ZP; Ren Z; Zhang H; Yong YY; Yao LQ; Zhou PH
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 22(4):377-382. PubMed ID: 31054553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Chandan S; Bapaye J; Khan SR; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Dahiya DS; Bilal M; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Rodriguez Sánchez J; Kochhar GS
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Aug; 11(8):E768-E777. PubMed ID: 37593155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors.
    Chow CWS; Fung TLD; Chan PT; Kwok KH
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1293-1302. PubMed ID: 36192659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scissor-assisted vs. conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Veras Ayres da Silva PH; So Taa Kum A; Logetto Caetité Gomes I; Miyajima NT; Moraes Bestetti A; Cadena Aguirre DP; Mansilla Gallegos MM; Menezes Nascimento Filho H; Gomes de Sousa IV; Marques Bernardo W; Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura E
    Dig Endosc; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Singh RR; Nanavati J; Gopakumar H; Kumta NA
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Nov; 11(11):E1082-E1091. PubMed ID: 38026781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis.
    Gong J; Chen T; Tan Y; Liu D
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Oct; 33(10):1241-1246. PubMed ID: 32732811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.
    Ide D; Ohya TR; Ishioka M; Enomoto Y; Nakao E; Mitsuyoshi Y; Tokura J; Suzuki K; Yakabi S; Yasue C; Chino A; Igarashi M; Nakashima A; Saruta M; Saito S; Fujisaki J
    Clin Endosc; 2022 Sep; 55(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 35636748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.