These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38252705)

  • 1. AttnPep: A Self-Attention-Based Deep Learning Method for Peptide Identification in Shotgun Proteomics.
    Li Y; He Q; Guo H; Shuai SC; Cheng J; Liu L; Shuai J
    J Proteome Res; 2024 Feb; 23(2):834-843. PubMed ID: 38252705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TIDD: tool-independent and data-dependent machine learning for peptide identification.
    Li H; Na S; Hwang KB; Paek E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):109. PubMed ID: 35354356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving X!Tandem on peptide identification from mass spectrometry by self-boosted Percolator.
    Yang P; Ma J; Wang P; Zhu Y; Zhou BB; Yang YH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 22689082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. pValid 2: A deep learning based validation method for peptide identification in shotgun proteomics with increased discriminating power.
    Zhou WJ; Wei ZH; He SM; Chi H
    J Proteomics; 2022 Jan; 251():104414. PubMed ID: 34737111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvements to the percolator algorithm for Peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets.
    Spivak M; Weston J; Bottou L; Käll L; Noble WS
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Jul; 8(7):3737-45. PubMed ID: 19385687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced peptide identification by electron transfer dissociation using an improved Mascot Percolator.
    Wright JC; Collins MO; Yu L; Käll L; Brosch M; Choudhary JS
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2012 Aug; 11(8):478-91. PubMed ID: 22493177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MUMAL2: Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using cost sensitive artificial neural networks and a threshold selector algorithm.
    Cerqueira FR; Ricardo AM; de Paiva Oliveira A; Graber A; Baumgartner C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 18):472. PubMed ID: 28105913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A decoy-free approach to the identification of peptides.
    Gonnelli G; Stock M; Verwaeren J; Maddelein D; De Baets B; Martens L; Degroeve S
    J Proteome Res; 2015 Apr; 14(4):1792-8. PubMed ID: 25714903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MSblender: A probabilistic approach for integrating peptide identifications from multiple database search engines.
    Kwon T; Choi H; Vogel C; Nesvizhskii AI; Marcotte EM
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Jul; 10(7):2949-58. PubMed ID: 21488652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of Search Engines and Postprocessing Approaches to Maximize Peptide and Protein Identification for High-Resolution Mass Data.
    Tu C; Sheng Q; Li J; Ma D; Shen X; Wang X; Shyr Y; Yi Z; Qu J
    J Proteome Res; 2015 Nov; 14(11):4662-73. PubMed ID: 26390080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peptide reranking with protein-peptide correspondence and precursor peak intensity information.
    Yang C; He Z; Yang C; Yu W
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(4):1212-9. PubMed ID: 22350209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical multidimensional space for scoring peptide spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics.
    Ivanov MV; Levitsky LI; Lobas AA; Panic T; Laskay ÜA; Mitulovic G; Schmid R; Pridatchenko ML; Tsybin YO; Gorshkov MV
    J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1911-20. PubMed ID: 24571493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets.
    Käll L; Canterbury JD; Weston J; Noble WS; MacCoss MJ
    Nat Methods; 2007 Nov; 4(11):923-5. PubMed ID: 17952086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cost-sensitive online learning method for peptide identification.
    Liang X; Xia Z; Jian L; Wang Y; Niu X; Link AJ
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 32334531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MUMAL: multivariate analysis in shotgun proteomics using machine learning techniques.
    Cerqueira FR; Ferreira RS; Oliveira AP; Gomes AP; Ramos HJ; Graber A; Baumgartner C
    BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 23095859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-dimensional target decoy strategy for shotgun proteomics.
    Bern MW; Kil YJ
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5296-301. PubMed ID: 22010998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative database search engine analysis on massive tandem mass spectra of pork-based food products for halal proteomics.
    Amir SH; Yuswan MH; Aizat WM; Mansor MK; Desa MNM; Yusof YA; Song LK; Mustafa S
    J Proteomics; 2021 Jun; 241():104240. PubMed ID: 33894373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.
    Audain E; Uszkoreit J; Sachsenberg T; Pfeuffer J; Liang X; Hermjakob H; Sanchez A; Eisenacher M; Reinert K; Tabb DL; Kohlbacher O; Perez-Riverol Y
    J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 150():170-182. PubMed ID: 27498275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Added value for tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics data validation through isoelectric focusing of peptides.
    Heller M; Ye M; Michel PE; Morier P; Stalder D; Jünger MA; Aebersold R; Reymond F; Rossier JS
    J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2273-82. PubMed ID: 16335976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
    Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
    J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.