These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38252948)

  • 1. How Hermann J. Muller Viewed the Ernest Sternglass Contributions to Hereditary and Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Calabrese EJ; Giordano J
    Health Phys; 2024 Mar; 126(3):151-155. PubMed ID: 38252948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Hermann J. Muller Viewed the Ernest Sternglass Contributions to Hereditary and Cancer Risk Assessment: Erratum.
    Health Phys; 2024 Aug; 127(2):349. PubMed ID: 38941520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hermann Muller and his LNT scientific and policy leadership: Private communication reveals uncertainties.
    Calabrese EJ; Selby PB
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 904():166757. PubMed ID: 37660820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confirmation that Hermann Muller was dishonest in his Nobel Prize Lecture.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2023 Nov; 97(11):2999-3003. PubMed ID: 37665363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thresholds for radiation induced mutation? The Muller-Evans debate: A turning point for cancer risk assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Chem Biol Interact; 2023 Sep; 382():110614. PubMed ID: 37356557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Muller and mutations: mouse study of George Snell (a postdoc of Muller) fails to confirm Muller's fruit fly findings, and Muller fails to cite Snell's findings.
    Calabrese EJ; Selby PB
    Arch Toxicol; 2024 Jun; 98(6):1953-1963. PubMed ID: 38573337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flaws in the LNT single-hit model for cancer risk: An historical assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Oct; 158():773-788. PubMed ID: 28756009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Key historical study findings questioned in debate over threshold versus linear non-threshold for cancer risk assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Chem Biol Interact; 2022 May; 359():109917. PubMed ID: 35378082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Muller's Nobel Prize data: Getting the dose wrong and its significance.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2019 Sep; 176():108528. PubMed ID: 31228809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Muller's Nobel Prize Lecture: when ideology prevailed over science.
    Calabrese EJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2012 Mar; 126(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 22166484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Muller mistakes: The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response and US EPA's cancer risk assessment policies and practices.
    Calabrese EJ; Selby PB
    Chem Biol Interact; 2023 Sep; 383():110653. PubMed ID: 37572872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Mistaken Birth and Adoption of LNT: An Abridged Version.
    Calabrese EJ
    Dose Response; 2017; 15(4):1559325817735478. PubMed ID: 29051718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():435-451. PubMed ID: 28109526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EPA transparency proposal: testimony of Edward J. Calabrese, Ph.D, October 3, 2018.
    Calabrese EJ
    J Cell Commun Signal; 2019 Mar; 13(1):145-147. PubMed ID: 30560424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Newly discovered letter: why Muller failed to cite the negative mouse mutation findings of Snell, preserving his chances to receive the Nobel Prize.
    Calabrese EJ; Selby PB
    Arch Toxicol; 2024 Aug; 98(8):2739-2741. PubMed ID: 38909170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2013 Dec; 87(12):2063-81. PubMed ID: 23912675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Muller's Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science?
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 85(12):1495-8. PubMed ID: 21717110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How did Hermann Muller publish a paper absent any data in the journal Science? Ethical questions and implications of Muller's Nobel Prize.
    Calabrese EJ; Giordano J
    Chem Biol Interact; 2022 Dec; 368():110204. PubMed ID: 36216107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.