159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38253996)
1. A cautionary tale: an evaluation of the performance of treatment switching adjustment methods in a real world case study.
Latimer NR; Dewdney A; Campioni M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):17. PubMed ID: 38253996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: a simulation study investigating the use of inverse probability weighting instead of re-censoring.
Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Siebert U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):69. PubMed ID: 30935369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: g-estimation to address time-dependent confounding.
Latimer NR; White IR; Tilling K; Siebert U
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2900-2918. PubMed ID: 32223524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjusting for treatment switching in randomised controlled trials - A simulation study and a simplified two-stage method.
Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Crowther MJ; Wailoo AJ; Morden JP; Akehurst RL; Campbell MJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):724-751. PubMed ID: 25416688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Causal inference for long-term survival in randomised trials with treatment switching: Should re-censoring be applied when estimating counterfactual survival times?
Latimer NR; White IR; Abrams KR; Siebert U
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2475-2493. PubMed ID: 29940824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A phase 3 trial evaluating panitumumab plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS or RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Kim TW; Elme A; Kusic Z; Park JO; Udrea AA; Kim SY; Ahn JB; Valencia RV; Krishnan S; Bilic A; Manojlovic N; Dong J; Guan X; Lofton-Day C; Jung AS; Vrdoljak E
Br J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 115(10):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 27736842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Final Analysis of Outcomes and RAS/BRAF Status in a Randomized Phase 3 Study of Panitumumab and Best Supportive Care in Chemorefractory Wild Type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Kim TW; Elme A; Park JO; Udrea AA; Kim SY; Ahn JB; Valencia RV; Krishnan S; Manojlovic N; Guan X; Lofton-Day C; Jung AS; Vrdoljak E
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2018 Sep; 17(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 29703606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No survival benefit from adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in KRAS wild type patients: a meta-analysis.
Zhou SW; Huang YY; Wei Y; Jiang ZM; Zhang YD; Yang Q; Xie DR
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50925. PubMed ID: 23226426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing methods for dealing with treatment switching in clinical trials: A follow-up simulation study.
Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Morden JP; Crowther MJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):765-784. PubMed ID: 27114326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjusting survival time estimates to account for treatment switching in randomized controlled trials--an economic evaluation context: methods, limitations, and recommendations.
Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Crowther MJ; Wailoo AJ; Morden JP; Akehurst RL; Campbell MJ
Med Decis Making; 2014 Apr; 34(3):387-402. PubMed ID: 24449433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Q-TWiST analysis comparing panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC) with BSC alone in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Wang J; Zhao Z; Barber B; Sherrill B; Peeters M; Wiezorek J
Br J Cancer; 2011 Jun; 104(12):1848-53. PubMed ID: 21610704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study.
Price TJ; Peeters M; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Zhang K; Murugappan S; Sidhu R
Lancet Oncol; 2014 May; 15(6):569-79. PubMed ID: 24739896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chan DLH; Segelov E; Wong RS; Smith A; Herbertson RA; Li BT; Tebbutt N; Price T; Pavlakis N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD007047. PubMed ID: 28654140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
