180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38254265)
1. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.
Ellis GM; Crukley J; Souza PE
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):760-774. PubMed ID: 38254265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.
Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31267958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preference for Combinations of Hearing Aid Signal Processing.
Rallapalli V; Schauer J; Souza P
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3100-3116. PubMed ID: 35881878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Reverberation on the Relation Between Compression Speed and Working Memory for Speech-in-Noise Perception.
Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza P
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1098-1105. PubMed ID: 31025984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition.
Rallapalli V; Ellis G; Souza P
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Stangl E
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23334355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment.
Reinhart PN; Souza PE; Srinivasan NK; Gallun FJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 26462171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the long-term SNRs of static and adaptive compression amplification techniques for speech in noise.
Lai YH; Li PC; Tsai KS; Chu WC; Young ST
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):671-83. PubMed ID: 24131603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intelligibility and Clarity of Reverberant Speech: Effects of Wide Dynamic Range Compression Release Time and Working Memory.
Reinhart PN; Souza PE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1543-1554. PubMed ID: 27997667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.
Alexander JM; Masterson K
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e35-49. PubMed ID: 25470368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Noise Reduction Algorithm May Not Compensate for the Degradation in Output Signal-to-Noise Ratio Caused by Wide Dynamic Range Compression.
Yun D; Lentz J; Shen Y
Am J Audiol; 2024 Jun; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 38875482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Adaptive Compression and Fast-Acting WDRC Strategies on Sentence Recognition in Noise in Mandarin-Speaking Pediatric Hearing Aid Users.
Liu H; Liu Y; Li Y; Jin X; Li J; Zhou Y; Ge W; Ni X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):273-278. PubMed ID: 29664721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.
Gustafson S; McCreery R; Hoover B; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz P
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 24473240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of reverberation, background talker number, and compression release time on signal-to-noise ratio.
Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza PE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):EL130. PubMed ID: 28764441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
Reinhart PN; Souza PE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
