BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38254906)

  • 41. Diagnostic performance of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer over five years.
    Veronesi G; Maisonneuve P; Spaggiari L; Rampinelli C; Pardolesi A; Bertolotti R; Filippi N; Bellomi M
    J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9(7):935-939. PubMed ID: 24922008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography for High-Risk Smokers in Australia.
    Wade S; Weber M; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Marshall H; Manser R; Vinod S; Rankin N; Fong K; Canfell K
    J Thorac Oncol; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1094-1105. PubMed ID: 29689434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Population-Based Screening Using Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations.
    Behr CM; Oude Wolcherink MJ; IJzerman MJ; Vliegenthart R; Koffijberg H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2023 Apr; 41(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 36670332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.
    Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    McLeod M; Sandiford P; Kvizhinadze G; Bartholomew K; Crengle S
    BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e037145. PubMed ID: 32973060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Meza R; Jeon J; Toumazis I; Ten Haaf K; Cao P; Bastani M; Han SS; Blom EF; Jonas DE; Feuer EJ; Plevritis SK; de Koning HJ; Kong CY
    JAMA; 2021 Mar; 325(10):988-997. PubMed ID: 33687469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Circulating microRNA signature as liquid-biopsy to monitor lung cancer in low-dose computed tomography screening.
    Sestini S; Boeri M; Marchiano A; Pelosi G; Galeone C; Verri C; Suatoni P; Sverzellati N; La Vecchia C; Sozzi G; Pastorino U
    Oncotarget; 2015 Oct; 6(32):32868-77. PubMed ID: 26451608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers.
    Diederich S; Thomas M; Semik M; Lenzen H; Roos N; Weber A; Heindel W; Wormanns D
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Apr; 14(4):691-702. PubMed ID: 14727146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. LDCT lung cancer screening in populations at different risk for lung cancer.
    Teles GBDS; Macedo ACS; Chate RC; Valente VAT; Funari MBG; Szarf G
    BMJ Open Respir Res; 2020 Feb; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 33371010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cost-effectiveness of implementing computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Taiwan.
    Yang SC; Lai WW; Lin CC; Su WC; Ku LJ; Hwang JS; Wang JD
    Lung Cancer; 2017 Jun; 108():183-191. PubMed ID: 28625633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Low-dose CT: a useful and accessible tool for the early diagnosis of lung cancer in selected populations.
    Callol L; Roig F; Cuevas A; de Granda JI; Villegas F; Jareño J; Arias E; Albiach JM
    Lung Cancer; 2007 May; 56(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 17316889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Role of Low-Dose Computerized Tomography in Lung Cancer Screening among Never-Smokers.
    Kang HR; Cho JY; Lee SH; Lee YJ; Park JS; Cho YJ; Yoon HI; Lee KW; Lee JH; Lee CT
    J Thorac Oncol; 2019 Mar; 14(3):436-444. PubMed ID: 30445189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
    Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Lung cancer screening: review and performance comparison under different risk scenarios.
    Tota JE; Ramanakumar AV; Franco EL
    Lung; 2014 Feb; 192(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24153450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: What We Have Learned in Two Decades of ITALUNG and What Is Yet to Be Addressed.
    Mascalchi M; Picozzi G; Puliti D; Diciotti S; Deliperi A; Romei C; Falaschi F; Pistelli F; Grazzini M; Vannucchi L; Bisanzi S; Zappa M; Gorini G; Carozzi FM; Carrozzi L; Paci E
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 37443590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.
    Tammemagi MC; Schmidt H; Martel S; McWilliams A; Goffin JR; Johnston MR; Nicholas G; Tremblay A; Bhatia R; Liu G; Soghrati K; Yasufuku K; Hwang DM; Laberge F; Gingras M; Pasian S; Couture C; Mayo JR; Nasute Fauerbach PV; Atkar-Khattra S; Peacock SJ; Cressman S; Ionescu D; English JC; Finley RJ; Yee J; Puksa S; Stewart L; Tsai S; Haider E; Boylan C; Cutz JC; Manos D; Xu Z; Goss GD; Seely JM; Amjadi K; Sekhon HS; Burrowes P; MacEachern P; Urbanski S; Sin DD; Tan WC; Leighl NB; Shepherd FA; Evans WK; Tsao MS; Lam S;
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1523-1531. PubMed ID: 29055736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cost-effectiveness of Low-Dose Computed Tomography With a Plasma-Based Biomarker for Lung Cancer Screening in China.
    Zhao Z; Wang Y; Wu W; Yang Y; Du L; Dong H
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2213634. PubMed ID: 35608858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Danish randomized lung cancer CT screening trial--overall design and results of the prevalence round.
    Pedersen JH; Ashraf H; Dirksen A; Bach K; Hansen H; Toennesen P; Thorsen H; Brodersen J; Skov BG; Døssing M; Mortensen J; Richter K; Clementsen P; Seersholm N
    J Thorac Oncol; 2009 May; 4(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 19357536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in heavy smokers: a microsimulation modelling study.
    Du Y; Sidorenkov G; Heuvelmans MA; Groen HJM; Vermeulen KM; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 135():121-129. PubMed ID: 32563896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Lung Cancer Risk and Demographic Characteristics of Current 20-29 Pack-year Smokers: Implications for Screening.
    Pinsky PF; Kramer BS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Nov; 107(11):. PubMed ID: 26483244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.