168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38256292)
1. Anastomotic Leak and Perioperative Outcomes of Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Geropoulos G; Moschonas S; Fanariotis G; Koltsida A; Madouros N; Koumadoraki E; Katsikas Triantafyllidis K; Kechagias KS; Koimtzis G; Giannis D; Notopoulos A; Pavlidis ET; Psarras K
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Dec; 60(1):. PubMed ID: 38256292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The cost burden of clinically significant esophageal anastomotic leaks-a steep price to pay.
Agzarian J; Visscher SL; Knight AW; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Nichols FC; Shen KR; Wigle D; Blackmon SH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 May; 157(5):2086-2092. PubMed ID: 30558876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the short-term outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic using data from a nationwide Japanese database.
Takeuchi M; Endo H; Hibi T; Seishima R; Nakano Y; Yamamoto H; Miyata H; Maeda H; Hanazaki K; Taketomi A; Kakeji Y; Seto Y; Ueno H; Mori M; Kitagawa Y
Esophagus; 2023 Oct; 20(4):617-625. PubMed ID: 37347341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Deng J; Su Q; Ren Z; Wen J; Xue Z; Zhang L; Chu X
Onco Targets Ther; 2018; 11():6057-6069. PubMed ID: 30275710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Performed During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Dolan DP; Swanson SJ; Lee DN; Polhemus E; Kucukak S; Wiener DC; Bueno R; Wee JO; White A
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022; 34(3):1075-1080. PubMed ID: 34217786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative hypotension is not associated with adverse short-term postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.
Yeheyis ET; Kassa S; Yeshitela H; Bekele A
BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 33388031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy.
Yuan Y; Zeng X; Hu Y; Xie T; Zhao Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11():CD008446. PubMed ID: 23152259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Strosberg DS; Merritt RE; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 27495339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of surgeon specialty on clinical outcomes following esophagectomy for cancer.
Verma A; Hadaya J; Kronen E; Sakowitz S; Chervu N; Bakhtiyar SS; Benharash P
Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8309-8315. PubMed ID: 37679585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.
Däster S; Soysal SD; Koechlin L; Stoll L; Peterli R; von Flüe M; Ackermann C
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Sep; 401(6):787-95. PubMed ID: 27436366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1961-1968. PubMed ID: 33485673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Yibulayin W; Abulizi S; Lv H; Sun W
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 14(1):304. PubMed ID: 27927246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel Mediastinoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Dabsha A; Elkharbotly IAMH; Yaghmour M; Badr A; Badie F; Khairallah S; Esmail YM; Shmushkevich S; Hossny M; Rizk A; Ishak A; Wright J; Mohamed A; Rahouma M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4030-4039. PubMed ID: 36820939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-Related Prognostic Factors for Anastomotic Leakage, Major Complications, and Short-Term Mortality Following Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
van Kooten RT; Voeten DM; Steyerberg EW; Hartgrink HH; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R; Tollenaar RAEM; Wouters MWJM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):1358-1373. PubMed ID: 34482453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of clinical outcomes after conservative and surgical treatment of isolated anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Lee DH; Kim HR; Kim SR; Kim YH; Kim DK; Park SI
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Aug; 26(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 23237428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database.
Kassis ES; Kosinski AS; Ross P; Koppes KE; Donahue JM; Daniel VC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Dec; 96(6):1919-26. PubMed ID: 24075499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying the role of preoperative oral/dental health care in post-esophagectomy pulmonary complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Papaconstantinou D; Fournaridi AV; Tasioudi K; Lidoriki I; Michalinos A; Konstantoudakis G; Schizas D
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36097793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors and outcomes associated with anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Lin A; Tharmaraja T; Bharwada Y; Bundred JR; Nepogodiev D; Evans RPT; Singh P; Griffiths EA
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Mar; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 31957798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
