These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38256608)

  • 1. Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategies in Takotsubo Syndrome with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review.
    von Mackensen JKR; Zwaans VIT; El Shazly A; Van Praet KM; Heck R; Starck CT; Schoenrath F; Potapov EV; Kempfert J; Jacobs S; Falk V; Wert L
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38256608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Life Support With and Without an Impella or Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Hendrickson MJ; Jain V; Bhatia K; Chew C; Arora S; Rossi JS; Villablanca P; Kapur NK; Joshi AA; Fox A; Mahmood K; Birati EY; Ricciardi MJ; Qamar A
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Dec; 11(23):e025216. PubMed ID: 36420809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical circulatory support for Takotsubo syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mariani S; Richter J; Pappalardo F; Bělohlávek J; Lorusso R; Schmitto JD; Bauersachs J; Napp LC
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 316():31-39. PubMed ID: 32473281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.
    Pahuja M; Hernandez-Montfort J; Whitehead EH; Kawabori M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34894975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Renal Function in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With or Without Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Upadhyaya VD; Alshami A; Patel I; Douedi S; Quinlan A; Thomas T; Prentice J; Calderon D; Asif A; Sen S; Mehra A; Hossain MA
    J Clin Med Res; 2021 May; 13(5):283-292. PubMed ID: 34104280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impella Mechanical Circulatory Support for Takotsubo Syndrome With Shock: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
    Napp LC; Westenfeld R; Møller JE; Pappalardo F; Ibrahim K; Bonello L; Wilkins C; Pershad A; Mannino SF; Schreiber TL; Hall PA; Medjamia AM; Haurand JM; Sieweke JT; Schäfer A; Grines CL; Burkhoff D; Moses JW; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Kapur NK; Bauersachs J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jul; 40():113-119. PubMed ID: 34916157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporary mechanical circulatory support for refractory heart failure: the German Heart Center Berlin experience.
    Nersesian G; Hennig F; Müller M; Mulzer J; Tsyganenko D; Starck C; Gromann T; Falk V; Potapov E; Schoenrath F
    Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Jan; 8(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 30854315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
    Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
    Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contemporary role of Impella in a comprehensive mechanical circulatory support program: a single institutional experience.
    Pieri M; Contri R; Winterton D; Montorfano M; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; De Bonis M; Pappalardo F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2015 Oct; 15():126. PubMed ID: 26466899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in refractory cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    den Uil CA; Akin S; Jewbali LS; Dos Reis Miranda D; Brugts JJ; Constantinescu AA; Kappetein AP; Caliskan K
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Jul; 52(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 28472406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients.
    Schäfer A; Werner N; Burkhoff D; Sieweke JT; Zietzer A; Masyuk M; Junker Udesen NL; Westenfeld R; Møller JE
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():74. PubMed ID: 32478095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.
    Tarabichi S; Ikegami H; Russo MJ; Lee LY; Lemaire A
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):218. PubMed ID: 32795321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra-aortic balloon pump versus percutaneous Impella
    Frain K; Rees P
    Perfusion; 2024 Jan; 39(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 34479465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Less Invasive Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella May Improve the Clinical Outcomes of Fulminant Myocarditis.
    Kawamura T; Toda K; Yoshioka D; Kawamura M; Saito T; Kawamura A; Nakamoto K; Sakata Y; Miyagawa S
    ASAIO J; 2023 Jun; 69(6):561-568. PubMed ID: 36848874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impella Microaxial Flow Catheter Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Myocarditis Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis From the Global cVAD Registry.
    Annamalai SK; Esposito ML; Jorde L; Schreiber T; A Hall S; O'Neill WW; Kapur NK
    J Card Fail; 2018 Oct; 24(10):706-710. PubMed ID: 30244180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière.
    Mastroianni C; Bouabdallaoui N; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2017 Feb; 6(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 26873912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.