These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38258795)

  • 1. Curved non-motorized treadmills do not biomechanically replicate overground running better than motorized treadmills.
    Catalá-Vilaplana I; Liu T; Vienneau J; Nigg SR; Pérez-Soriano P; Encarnación-Martínez A
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Nov; 41(21):1927-1933. PubMed ID: 38258795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies.
    Van Hooren B; Fuller JT; Buckley JD; Miller JR; Sewell K; Rao G; Barton C; Bishop C; Willy RW
    Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 50(4):785-813. PubMed ID: 31802395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Both Motorized and Nonmotorized Treadmill Gait Kinematics to Overground Locomotion.
    Fullenkamp AM; Tolusso DV; Laurent CM; Campbell BM; Cripps AE
    J Sport Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 27(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 28605231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint kinematics and kinetics of overground accelerated running versus running on an accelerated treadmill.
    Caekenberghe IV; Segers V; Aerts P; Willems P; De Clercq D
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Jul; 10(84):20130222. PubMed ID: 23676896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of a Curved Non-Motorized Treadmill on Running Gait Length, Imbalance and Stride Angle.
    Hatchett A; Armstrong K; Parr B; Crews M; Tant C
    Sports (Basel); 2018 Jun; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 29966259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-pubertal runners demonstrate greater variability in running kinematics than post-pubertal runners.
    Close EL; Garcia MC; Bazett-Jones DM
    Gait Posture; 2024 Jan; 107():136-140. PubMed ID: 37244771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint kinematics and ground reaction forces in overground versus treadmill graded running.
    Firminger CR; Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Millet GY; Edwards WB
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():109-113. PubMed ID: 29729612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional kinematic comparison of treadmill and overground running.
    Sinclair J; Richards J; Taylor PJ; Edmundson CJ; Brooks D; Hobbs SJ
    Sports Biomech; 2013 Sep; 12(3):272-82. PubMed ID: 24245052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running.
    Nigg BM; De Boer RW; Fisher V
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jan; 27(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 7898346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of sagittal plane gait characteristics between the overground and treadmill approach for gait analysis in typically developing children.
    Senden R; Marcellis R; Meijer K; Willems P; Lenssen T; Staal H; Janssen Y; Groen V; Vermeulen RJ; Witlox M
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13752. PubMed ID: 35898943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running.
    Fellin RE; Manal K; Davis IS
    J Appl Biomech; 2010 Nov; 26(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 21245500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is treadmill walking biomechanically comparable to overground walking? A systematic review.
    Semaan MB; Wallard L; Ruiz V; Gillet C; Leteneur S; Simoneau-Buessinger E
    Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():249-257. PubMed ID: 34890914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical factors that differentiate body kinematics between treadmill and overground walking.
    Jung M; Koo S
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():888691. PubMed ID: 36091453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treadmill vs. overground running gait during childhood: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.
    Rozumalski A; Novacheck TF; Griffith CJ; Walt K; Schwartz MH
    Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):613-8. PubMed ID: 25662042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of muscle activity of the lower limbs while running on different treadmill models.
    Kaltenbach C; Gollhofer A; Nigg BM; Asmussen MJ
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1341772. PubMed ID: 38638809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fatigue matters: An intense 10 km run alters frontal and transverse plane joint kinematics in competitive and recreational adult runners.
    Willwacher S; Sanno M; Brüggemann GP
    Gait Posture; 2020 Feb; 76():277-283. PubMed ID: 31884254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of anti-pronation shoes on lower limb kinematics and kinetics in female runners with pronated feet: The role of physical fatigue.
    Jafarnezhadgero A; Alavi-Mehr SM; Granacher U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216818. PubMed ID: 31086402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running.
    Riley PO; Dicharry J; Franz J; Della Croce U; Wilder RP; Kerrigan DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Jun; 40(6):1093-100. PubMed ID: 18460996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in running technique between runners with better and poorer running economy and lower and higher milage: An artificial neural network approach.
    Van Hooren B; Lennartz R; Cox M; Hoitz F; Plasqui G; Meijer K
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2024 Mar; 34(3):e14605. PubMed ID: 38511261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of coordination and its variability in lower extremity segments during treadmill and overground running at different speeds.
    Abbasi A; Yazdanbakhsh F; Tazji MK; Aghaie Ataabadi P; Svoboda Z; Nazarpour K; Vieira MF
    Gait Posture; 2020 Jun; 79():139-144. PubMed ID: 32408037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.