These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3826092)
1. Experiences of the Texas PRO. Dunne PK; Martin J Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 44(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 3826092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. PRO experiences at a Florida community hospital. Hittel WP Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 44(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 3826093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PRO experiences at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. Schoofs AL; Thielke TS Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 44(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 3826094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of PROs on hospitals and pharmacy practice. Black BL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 44(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3548342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. VA's PRO pilot project implemented in Texas. Miller E Tex Hosp; 1987 Jun; 43(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 10301657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of pharmacy PSRO criteria and standards for South Carolina hospitals. Schwerin GD; Nelson AA Hosp Pharm; 1978 Oct; 13(10):535, 541-2, 547 passim. PubMed ID: 10273110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. They've developed a Texas-sized review program. Stacey J Am Med News; 1978 Aug; 21(32):11. PubMed ID: 10308657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. PRO review of hospital admissions of Medicare patients. Akhter MN Mo Med; 1985 Mar; 82(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 3919255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Audit mechanism for hospital drug distribution. Broekemeier RL; Brewer PE; Johnson MK Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Jan; 37(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 7189096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concurrent ceftazidime DUE with clinical pharmacy intervention. Okpara AU; Van Duyn OM; Cate TR; Cheung LK; Galley MA Hosp Formul; 1994 May; 29(5):392-4, 399, 402-4. PubMed ID: 10133902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Looking at rural hospital issues and problems from a federal perspective. Hall RM; Stenholm CW; Sweeney M Tex Hosp; 1988 Jan; 43(8):12-7. PubMed ID: 10285940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of a service improvement program for ambulatory pharmacy services. Hayman JN; Hatwig CA; Crane VS Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1996 Oct; 16(3):67-78. PubMed ID: 10166237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New methodology challenges PRO. Harrop DE Pa Med; 1993 Apr; 96(4):42. PubMed ID: 8479765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Going after favorable PRO determinations. Gosfield AG Cost Containment; 1985 Oct; 7(19):3-6. PubMed ID: 10273714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. PRO-hospital contracts: the last chance to ease burden of reviews. O'Hare PK; Collier G Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):54-8. PubMed ID: 10299720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Drug review will be a part of PSROs but pharmacists await word on what their role will be. Bowles GC Mod Hosp; 1973 Dec; 121(6):92. PubMed ID: 4798881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]