These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38261027)

  • 1. Discussion of hemodynamic optimization strategies and the canonical understanding of hemodynamics during biventricular mechanical support in cardiogenic shock: does the flow balance make the difference?
    Patsalis N; Kreutz J; Chatzis G; Fichera CF; Syntila S; Choukeir M; Griewing S; Schieffer B; Markus B
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2024 Apr; 113(4):602-611. PubMed ID: 38261027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of microaxillar mechanical left ventricular support on renal resistive index in patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a pilot trial to predict renal organ dysfunction in cardiogenic shock.
    Markus B; Patsalis N; Chatzis G; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Schieffer B; Karatolios K
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 31246097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acute Biventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Kuchibhotla S; Esposito ML; Breton C; Pedicini R; Mullin A; O'Kelly R; Anderson M; Morris DL; Batsides G; Ramzy D; Grise M; Pham DT; Kapur NK
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29054842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of concomitant vasoactive treatment and mechanical left ventricular unloading in a porcine model of profound cardiogenic shock.
    Udesen NLJ; Helgestad OKL; Banke ABS; Frederiksen PH; Josiassen J; Jensen LO; Schmidt H; Edelman ER; Chang BY; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    Crit Care; 2020 Mar; 24(1):95. PubMed ID: 32188462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unmasking right ventricular failure in cardiogenic shock: The importance of serial hemodynamics.
    Lemor A; Al-Darzi W; O'Neill W; Basir MB
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 97(6):1209-1212. PubMed ID: 33484043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
    Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Garan AR; Takeda K; Salna M; Vandenberge J; Doshi D; Karmpaliotis D; Kirtane AJ; Takayama H; Kurlansky P
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 May; 8(9):e012171. PubMed ID: 31041870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device as mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary academic medical center.
    Nouri SN; Malick W; Masoumi A; Fried JA; Topkara VK; Brener MI; Ahmad Y; Prasad M; Rabbani LE; Takeda K; Karmpaliotis D; Moses JW; Leon MB; Kirtane AJ; Garan AR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 33325612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.
    Basir MB; Lemor A; Gorgis S; Patel KC; Kolski BC; Bharadwaj AS; Todd JW; Tehrani BN; Truesdell AG; Lasorda DM; Lalonde TA; Kaki A; Schrieber TL; Patel NC; Senter SR; Gelormini JL; Marso SP; Rahman AM; Federici RE; Wilkins CE; Thomas McRae A; Nsair A; Caputo CP; Khuddus MA; Chahin JJ; Dupont AG; Goldsweig AM; Lim MJ; Kapur NK; Wohns DHW; Zhou Y; Hacala MJ; O'Neill WW
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Dec; 12(23):e031401. PubMed ID: 38014676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.
    Radakovic D; Zittermann A; Knezevic A; Razumov A; Opacic D; Wienrautner N; Flottmann C; Rojas SV; Fox H; Schramm R; Morshuis M; Rudolph V; Gummert J; Deutsch MA
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2022 Jan; 34(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 34999807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella
    Patsalis N; Kreutz J; Chatzis G; Syntila S; Griewing S; Pirlet-Grant C; Schlegel M; Schieffer B; Markus B
    J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.
    Wilkins CE; Herrera TL; Nagahiro MK; Weathers LB; Girotra SV; Sandhu F
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 31(2):E23-E29. PubMed ID: 30700627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined pulmonary and left ventricular support with veno-pulmonary ECMO and impella 5.0 for cardiogenic shock after coronary surgery.
    Sayed S; Schimmer C; Shade I; Leyh R; Aleksic I
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 May; 12(1):38. PubMed ID: 28532425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Hemodynamic Support by Impella vs. Peripheral Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Nix C; Ishikawa K; Meyns B; Yasuda S; Adriaenssens T; Barth S; Zayat R; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():99. PubMed ID: 32587862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting Pulmonary Hypertension in the Era of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support - Literature Review and Case-Based Discussion.
    Sharma S; Ruiz J; Paghdar S; Desai S; Goswami R
    Transplant Proc; 2023 Dec; 55(10):2462-2469. PubMed ID: 37980253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous biventricular Impella support in therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Chiu CY; Hättasch R; Praeger D; Knebel F; Stangl K; Ramirez ID; Dreger H
    Heart Lung; 2018; 47(3):250-252. PubMed ID: 29628145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Budget Impact Analysis of Impella CP
    Delmas C; Pernot M; Le Guyader A; Joret R; Roze S; Lebreton G
    Adv Ther; 2022 Mar; 39(3):1293-1309. PubMed ID: 35067868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Stabilizes and Potentially Rescues Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.
    Tongers J; Sieweke JT; Kühn C; Napp LC; Flierl U; Röntgen P; Schmitto JD; Sedding DG; Haverich A; Bauersachs J; Schäfer A
    Circ Heart Fail; 2020 Mar; 13(3):e005853. PubMed ID: 32164431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.