These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38261133)

  • 61. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Lourenço A; Medin J; Vatnitsky S; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. On the perturbation effect and LET dependence of beam quality correction factors in carbon ion beams.
    Khan AU; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 36334024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for high energy electron beams.
    Alissa M; Zink K; Röser A; Flatten V; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
    Phys Med; 2024 Jan; 117():103179. PubMed ID: 38042061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams.
    Bouchard H; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2454-65. PubMed ID: 15487725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
    Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. LET dependence of GafChromic films and an ion chamber in low-energy proton dosimetry.
    Kirby D; Green S; Palmans H; Hugtenburg R; Wojnecki C; Parker D
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):417-33. PubMed ID: 20019399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Calculation of k(Q(clin),Q(msr) ) (f(clin),f(msr) ) for several small detectors and for two linear accelerators using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Satariano N
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6513-27. PubMed ID: 22149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Correction-less dosimetry of nonstandard photon fields: a new criterion to determine the usability of radiation detectors.
    Kamio Y; Bouchard H
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(17):4973-5002. PubMed ID: 25118890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Ionization chamber gradient effects in nonstandard beam configurations.
    Bouchard H; Seuntjens J; Carrier JF; Kawrakow I
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4654-63. PubMed ID: 19928097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. VMAT and IMRT plan-specific correction factors for linac-based ionization chamber dosimetry.
    Desai VK; Labby ZE; Hyun MA; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):913-924. PubMed ID: 30449040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Detailed Monte-Carlo characterization of a Faraday cup for proton therapy.
    Ehwald J; Togno M; Lomax AJ; Weber DC; Safai S; Winterhalter C
    Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5828-5841. PubMed ID: 37227735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluation of the water-equivalence of plastic materials in low- and high-energy clinical proton beams.
    Lourenço A; Shipley D; Wellock N; Thomas R; Bouchard H; Kacperek A; Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Schwarz M; MacDougall N; Royle G; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):3883-3901. PubMed ID: 28319031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Determination of beam quality correction factors for the Roos plane-parallel ionisation chamber exposed to very high energy electron (VHEE) beams using Geant4.
    McManus M; Romano F; Royle G; Botnariuc D; Shipley D; Palmans H; Subiel A
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Mar; 67(6):. PubMed ID: 35240589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Measured and Monte Carlo calculated K(Q) factors: accuracy and comparison.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4600-9. PubMed ID: 21928633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors for PTW cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
    Giménez-Alventosa V; Giménez V; Ballester F; Vijande J; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 65(20):205005. PubMed ID: 32434170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Monte Carlo correction factors for a Farmer 0.6 cm3 ion chamber dose measurement in the build-up region of the 6 MV clinical beam.
    Pena J; Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Terrón JA; Gómez F
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16510960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality.
    Malkov VN; Rogers DWO
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):908-925. PubMed ID: 29218730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Monte Carlo simulations of a novel Micromegas 2D array for proton dosimetry.
    Dolney D; Ainsley C; Hollebeek R; Maughan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 61(4):1563-72. PubMed ID: 26816338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
    González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.