139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38261370)
1. Steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials Reveal Dynamic (Re)allocation of Spatial Attention during Maintenance and Utilization of Visual Working Memory.
Chota S; Bruat AT; Van der Stigchel S; Strauch C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; 36(5):800-814. PubMed ID: 38261370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting visual short-term memory during maintenance: Attentional modulation of target and distractor representations.
Vissers ME; Gulbinaite R; van den Bos T; Slagter HA
Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):4061. PubMed ID: 28642613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The steady-state visual evoked potential reveals neural correlates of the items encoded into visual working memory.
Peterson DJ; Gurariy G; Dimotsantos GG; Arciniega H; Berryhill ME; Caplovitz GP
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():145-53. PubMed ID: 25173712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
Allon AS; Luria R
Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory.
Heuer A; Crawford JD; Schubö A
Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):413-427. PubMed ID: 27822732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.
Heuer A; Schubö A
Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):621-32. PubMed ID: 26754949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.
Bekhtereva V; Craddock M; Müller MM
Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():254-266. PubMed ID: 25818682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
Gulbinaite R; Johnson A; de Jong R; Morey CC; van Rijn H
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():197-206. PubMed ID: 24878830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induced and Evoked Human Electrophysiological Correlates of Visual Working Memory Set-Size Effects at Encoding.
Gurariy G; Killebrew KW; Berryhill ME; Caplovitz GP
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167022. PubMed ID: 27902738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.
Lorenc ES; Sreenivasan KK; Nee DE; Vandenbroucke ARE; D'Esposito M
J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(23):5267-5276. PubMed ID: 29739867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory.
Beck VM; Vickery TJ
Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():159-169. PubMed ID: 30392969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Too little, too late, and in the wrong place: Alpha band activity does not reflect an active mechanism of selective attention.
Antonov PA; Chakravarthi R; Andersen SK
Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117006. PubMed ID: 32485307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
Beck VM; Vickery TJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Separating the effects of visual working memory load and attentional zoom on selective attention.
Lee H; Jeong SK
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 32162967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.
Gaspar JM; Christie GJ; Prime DJ; Jolicœur P; McDonald JJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(13):3693-8. PubMed ID: 26903654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Competition for attentional resources between low spatial frequency content of emotional images and a foreground task in early visual cortex.
Müller MM; Gundlach C
Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):429-443. PubMed ID: 27990660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. α Power Modulation and Event-Related Slow Wave Provide Dissociable Correlates of Visual Working Memory.
Fukuda K; Mance I; Vogel EK
J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 35(41):14009-16. PubMed ID: 26468201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
