These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38261370)

  • 41. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Tracking the time-course of attentional involvement in spatial working memory: an event-related potential investigation.
    Jha AP
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Dec; 15(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 12506934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.
    Itthipuripat S; Garcia JO; Serences JT
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 May; 109(9):2364-73. PubMed ID: 23390315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Does visual working memory represent the predicted locations of future target objects? An event-related brain potential study.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():258-66. PubMed ID: 25445999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Visual working memory representations bias attention more when they are the target of an action plan.
    Trentin C; Slagter HA; Olivers CNL
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105274. PubMed ID: 36113256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.
    Lu J; Tian L; Zhang J; Wang J; Ye C; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16314. PubMed ID: 29176675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Attentional Selection of Feature Conjunctions Is Accomplished by Parallel and Independent Selection of Single Features.
    Andersen SK; Müller MM; Hillyard SA
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9912-9. PubMed ID: 26156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distinct neural mechanisms for spatially lateralized and spatially global visual working memory representations.
    Fukuda K; Kang MS; Woodman GF
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Oct; 116(4):1715-1727. PubMed ID: 27440249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Electrophysiological evidence for target facilitation without distractor suppression in two-stimulus search displays.
    Forschack N; Gundlach C; Hillyard S; Müller MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Aug; 32(17):3816-3828. PubMed ID: 35034125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual-cortical enhancement by acoustic distractors: The effects of endogenous spatial attention and visual working memory load.
    Cavicchi S; De Cesarei A; Valsecchi M; Codispoti M
    Biol Psychol; 2023 Feb; 177():108512. PubMed ID: 36724810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ventral fronto-parietal contributions to the disruption of visual working memory storage.
    Hakun JG; Ravizza SM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):783-793. PubMed ID: 26436710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development of visual working memory and distractor resistance in relation to academic performance.
    Tsubomi H; Watanabe K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Feb; 154():98-112. PubMed ID: 27838550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.
    Hinault T; Blacker KJ; Gormley M; Anderson BA; Courtney SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 30460482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Extent and time-course of competition in visual cortex between emotionally arousing distractors and a concurrent task.
    Deweese MM; Müller M; Keil A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 43(7):961-70. PubMed ID: 26790572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A negative emotional state impairs individuals' ability to filter distractors from working memory: an ERP study.
    Ye C; Liu R; Guo L; Zhao G; Liu Q
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):491-504. PubMed ID: 38351397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.