120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38262183)
1. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics implementation to enhance vertebral fracture finite element model in a cervical spine segment under compression.
Ngan S; Rampersadh C; Rycman A; Cronin DS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Mar; 151():106412. PubMed ID: 38262183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advanced compressive extension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine: do we really understand the nuances of this injury?
Rebich E; Tavolaro C; Yao J; Zhou H; Agel J; Bransford R; Bellabarba C
Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 33610805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of post-injury spinal position on canal occlusion in a cervical spine burst fracture model.
Ching RP; Watson NA; Carter JW; Tencer AF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Aug; 22(15):1710-5. PubMed ID: 9259780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the intervertebral disc on vertebral bone strength prediction: a finite-element study.
Anitha DP; Baum T; Kirschke JS; Subburaj K
Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 31841703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of numerical methods for cerebrospinal fluid representation and fluid-structure interaction during transverse impact of a finite element spinal cord model.
Rycman A; McLachlin S; Cronin DS
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Mar; 38(3):e3570. PubMed ID: 34997836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite Element Analysis of a New Type of Spinal Protection Device for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.
Che M; Wang Y; Zhao Y; Zhang S; Yu J; Gong W; Zhang D; Liu M
Orthop Surg; 2022 Mar; 14(3):577-586. PubMed ID: 35147295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model.
Whyne CM; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):652-60. PubMed ID: 12671351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occlusion of the lumbar spine canal during high-rate axial compression.
Robinson DL; Tse KM; Franklyn M; Ackland DC; Richardson MD; Lee PVS
Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1692-1704. PubMed ID: 32442519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study.
Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 10619089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporating ligament laxity in a finite element model for the upper cervical spine.
Lasswell TL; Cronin DS; Medley JB; Rasoulinejad P
Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1755-1764. PubMed ID: 28673824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite Element Method Analysis of Compression Fractures on Whole-Spine Models Including the Rib Cage.
Nishida N; Ohgi J; Jiang F; Ito S; Imajo Y; Suzuki H; Funaba M; Nakashima D; Sakai T; Chen X
Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():8348631. PubMed ID: 31191711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High resolution quantitative computed tomography-based assessment of trabecular microstructure and strength estimates by finite-element analysis of the spine, but not DXA, reflects vertebral fracture status in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
Graeff C; Marin F; Petto H; Kayser O; Reisinger A; Peña J; Zysset P; Glüer CC
Bone; 2013 Feb; 52(2):568-77. PubMed ID: 23149277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparative evaluation of percutaneous fixations with vertebral expansion for vertebral compression fractures: an experimental and finite element study.
Lucas LG; Lucas VPCL; Sylvain P; Agathe N; Marc-Antoine R; Laurie S; Wafa S
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Apr; 25(5):487-498. PubMed ID: 34342248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion.
Lim TH; Kwon H; Jeon CH; Kim JG; Sokolowski M; Natarajan R; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):951-6. PubMed ID: 11317120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of morphological variations on cervical spine segmental responses from inertial loading.
John JD; Yoganandan N; Arun MWJ; Saravana Kumar G
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S29-S36. PubMed ID: 29584503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical spine segment finite element model for traumatic injury prediction.
DeWit JA; Cronin DS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jun; 10():138-50. PubMed ID: 22520426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiphoton microscope measurement-based biphasic multiscale analyses of knee joint articular cartilage and chondrocyte by using visco-anisotropic hyperelastic finite element method and smoothed particle hydrodynamics method.
Nakamachi E; Noma T; Nakahara K; Tomita Y; Morita Y
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 33(11):. PubMed ID: 28058781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-level subject-specific finite element model can predict fracture outcomes in three-level spine segments under different loading rates.
Rezaei A; Tilton M; Li Y; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104833. PubMed ID: 34534795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modular incorporation of deformable spine and 3D neck musculature into a simplified human body finite element model.
Lalwala M; Koya B; Devane K; Gayzik FS; Weaver AA
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024; 27(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 36657616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
