134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38262439)
21. Heterogenicity of testicular histopathology and tubules as a predictor of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.
Yu Y; Xi Q; Wang R; Zhang H; Li L; Liu R; Pan Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(22):e10914. PubMed ID: 29851822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Azoospermia Type Does Not Affect Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Results When Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Is Performed.
Aydin T; Yücel B; Sofikerim M; Karadag M; Tokat F
J Reprod Med; 2016; 61(11-12):581-4. PubMed ID: 30226717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) - a new sperm recovery technique helping men with non-obstructive azoospermia].
Westlander G; Schmidt J; Westin C
Lakartidningen; 2019 Jul; 116():. PubMed ID: 31334817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with fresh testicular spermatozoa obtained on the day of or the day before oocyte collection and with cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with azoospermia.
Karacan M; Alwaeely F; Erkan S; Çebi Z; Berberoğlugil M; Batukan M; Uluğ M; Arvas A; Çamlıbel T
Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):975-80. PubMed ID: 23891272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sperm retrieval outcomes with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with cryptozoospermia.
Alrabeeah K; Wachter A; Phillips S; Cohen B; Al-Hathal N; Zini A
Andrology; 2015 May; 3(3):462-6. PubMed ID: 25784486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A complete dissection of the whole testicular parenchyma is required in most patients with nonobstructive azoospermia to obtain enough good quality testicular spermatozoa for ICSI.
Caroppo E; Castiglioni F; Nerva F; Colpi EM; Gazzano G; Colpi GM
Andrology; 2023 Mar; 11(3):508-514. PubMed ID: 36416145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Prediction Model of Sperm Retrieval in Males with Idiopathic Non-obstructive Azoospermia for Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction.
Zheng Y; Li DM; Jiang XH; Bai HZ; Zhao GC
Reprod Sci; 2024 Feb; 31(2):366-374. PubMed ID: 37749447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Testicular sperm characteristics in men with nonobstructive azoospermia and their impact on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome.
Aboukhshaba A; Punjani N; Doukakis S; Zaninovic N; Palermo G; Schlegel PN
Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):522-527. PubMed ID: 34674828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed mTESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Long-term experience at a single institute.
Yücel C; Budak S; Keskin MZ; Kisa E; Kozacioglu Z
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Jun; 90(2):136-140. PubMed ID: 29974724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Age does not adversely affect sperm retrieval in men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
Ramasamy R; Trivedi NN; Reifsnyder JE; Palermo GD; Rosenwaks Z; Schlegel PN
Fertil Steril; 2014 Mar; 101(3):653-5. PubMed ID: 24424360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Embryo development and live birth resulted from artificial oocyte activation after microdissection testicular sperm extraction with ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.
Zhang X; Li L; Zhang W; Luo Y; Mao Y; Du H; Li L
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1123541. PubMed ID: 36896176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ultrasonographically determined size of seminiferous tubules predicts sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.
Nariyoshi S; Nakano K; Sukegawa G; Sho T; Tsuji Y
Fertil Steril; 2020 Jan; 113(1):97-104.e2. PubMed ID: 32033740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sperm retrieval outcomes of contralateral testis in men with nonobstructive azoospermia and unsuccessful unilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
Zhang Z; Xi Y; Liu DF; Mao JM; Zhang HT; Lin HC; Tang WH; Jiang H; Hong K; Zhao LM
Fertil Steril; 2024 Mar; 121(3):540-542. PubMed ID: 38036241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modern surgical treatment of azoospermia.
Brant A; Schlegel PN
Curr Opin Urol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 36301052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Utility of micro-TESE in the most severe cases of non-obstructive azoospermia.
Westlander G
Ups J Med Sci; 2020 May; 125(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 32233715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction for men with non-obstructive azoospermia.
Klami R; Mankonen H; Perheentupa A
Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 18(2):137-142. PubMed ID: 29602610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia.
Okada H; Dobashi M; Yamazaki T; Hara I; Fujisawa M; Arakawa S; Kamidono S
J Urol; 2002 Sep; 168(3):1063-7. PubMed ID: 12187223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Outcome and predictive factors.
Ghalayini IF; Alazab R; Halalsheh O; Al-Mohtaseb AH; Al-Ghazo MA
Arab J Urol; 2022; 20(3):137-143. PubMed ID: 35935909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: effect of prior biopsy on success of sperm retrieval.
Ramasamy R; Schlegel PN
J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1447-9. PubMed ID: 17382751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical comparison between conventional and microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia: Understanding which treatment works for which patient.
Maglia E; Boeri L; Fontana M; Gallioli A; De Lorenzis E; Palmisano F; Zanetti S; Sampogna G; Restelli L; Somigliana E; Serrago M; Gadda F; Montanari E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Jun; 90(2):130-135. PubMed ID: 29974723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
