113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38262466)
1. Evaluation of Porcine Collagen Membranes Used with Guided Bone Regeneration for Critical Defects: A Histological, Histomorphometric, Immunohistochemical, and Inflammatory Profile Analysis.
Ramos EU; Leandro MNC; Criales JOC; Buitron MRO; Verástegui ES; Carbajal WM; Adrianzén RCS; Grijalva AEE; Baylon AAB; Bassi APF
Eur J Dent; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38262466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study.
Bizelli VF; Ramos EU; Veras ASC; Teixeira GR; Faverani LP; Bassi APF
Membranes (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Guided Bone Regeneration in Critical Defects Using Bovine and Porcine Collagen Membranes: Histomorphometric and Immunohistochemical Analyses.
Ramires GAD; Helena JT; Oliveira JCS; Faverani LP; Bassi APF
Int J Biomater; 2021; 2021():8828194. PubMed ID: 33859694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Osteopromotion Capacity of Bovine Cortical Membranes in Critical Defects of Rat Calvaria: Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis.
Danieletto-Zanna CF; Bizelli VF; Ramires GADA; Francatti TM; de Carvalho PSP; Bassi APF
Int J Biomater; 2020; 2020():6426702. PubMed ID: 32148506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface topography of resorbable porcine collagen membranes, and their effect on early osteogenesis: An in vitro study.
Marques D; Teixeira LN; Elias CN; Lemos AB; Martinez EF
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 124(6S):101607. PubMed ID: 37582461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biocompatibility and biodegradation of a native porcine pericardium membrane: results of in vitro and in vivo examinations.
Rothamel D; Schwarz F; Fienitz T; Smeets R; Dreiseidler T; Ritter L; Happe A; Zöller J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 22299091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the Bacterial Cellulose Membrane Feasible for Osteopromotive Property?
Farnezi Bassi AP; Bizelli VF; Brasil LFM; Pereira JC; Al-Sharani HM; Momesso GAC; Faverani LP; Lucas FA
Membranes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32932731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in degradation behavior of two non-cross-linked collagen barrier membranes: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Bozkurt A; Apel C; Sellhaus B; van Neerven S; Wessing B; Hilgers RD; Pallua N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1403-11. PubMed ID: 25539007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo evaluation of resorbable supercritical CO
Tovar N; Witek L; Neiva R; Marão HF; Gil LF; Atria P; Jimbo R; Caceres EA; Coelho PG
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Jul; 107(5):1320-1328. PubMed ID: 30199603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two resorbable membrane systems in bone regeneration after removal of wisdom teeth: a randomized-controlled clinical pilot study.
Zwahlen RA; Cheung LK; Zheng LW; Chow RL; Li T; Schuknecht B; Grätz KW; Weber FE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1084-91. PubMed ID: 19751357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue dynamics and regenerative outcome in two resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration: A preclinical molecular and histological study in vivo.
Omar O; Dahlin A; Gasser A; Dahlin C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 28703398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone Regeneration Assessment of Polycaprolactone Membrane on Critical-Size Defects in Rat Calvaria.
Farnezi Bassi AP; Ferreira Bizelli V; Mello Francatti T; Rezende de Moares Ferreira AC; Carvalho Pereira J; Al-Sharani HM; de Almeida Lucas F; Faverani LP
Membranes (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33572318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guided bone regeneration in calvarial critical size bony defect using a double-layer resorbable collagen membrane covering a xenograft: a histological and histomorphometric study in rats.
Abou Fadel R; Samarani R; Chakar C
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 22(2):203-213. PubMed ID: 29654386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polydioxanone Membrane Compared with Collagen Membrane for Bone Regeneration.
Quirino LC; de Azambuja Carvalho PH; Neto RTA; Comachio CA; Monteiro NG; Ervolino-Silva AC; Okamoto R; Pereira-Filho VA
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Feb; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 36850154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of Mucograft vs Conventional Resorbable Collagen Membranes in Guided Bone Regeneration Around Standardized Calvarial Defects in Rats: A Histologic and Biomechanical Assessment.
Ramalingam S; Basudan A; Babay N; Al-Rasheed A; Nooh N; Nagshbandi J; Aldahmash A; Atteya M; Al-Hezaimi K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36 Suppl():s99-s107. PubMed ID: 27031638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative barrier membrane degradation over time: Pericardium versus dermal membranes.
Bornert F; Herber V; Sandgren R; Witek L; Coelho PG; Pippenger BE; Shahdad S
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Oct; 7(5):711-718. PubMed ID: 33949796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a Novel Barrier Membrane Based on Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).
Lindner C; Alkildani S; Stojanovic S; Najman S; Jung O; Barbeck M
Membranes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35448348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects.
Oh TJ; Meraw SJ; Lee EJ; Giannobile WV; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 12562369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of a semi-resorbable membrane based on silk fibroin-Glycerol on bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects compared to a commercial collagen membrane.
Sukchan K; Pripatnanont P; Tunthasen R; Meesane J
J Biomater Appl; 2023 Feb; 37(7):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 36044990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo evaluation of a collagen membrane in bone neoformation: A morphological and histomorphometric study.
Di Pillo MK; Montagner PG; Teixeira LN; Martinez EF
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 124(1S):101372. PubMed ID: 36574881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
