These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38262586)
21. Reliability of qualitative occlusal tooth wear evaluation using an intraoral scanner: A pilot study. Travassos da Rosa Moreira Bastos R; Teixeira da Silva P; Normando D PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0249119. PubMed ID: 33765042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of titanium dioxide and composite on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner for bilateral upper posterior edentulous jaw (Kennedy class I) scanning: An in vitro study. Vo HM; Huynh NC; Tran TT; Hoang HT; Nguyen AT J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104747. PubMed ID: 37863172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Simulation of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions by Computational Toothbrush Model: A Novel Three-Dimensional Discrete Element Method. Nam J; Nguyen DH; Lee S; Heo SM; Park J Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions and orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study. Gomes RR; Zeola LF; Barbosa TAQ; Fernandes Neto AJ; de Araujo Almeida G; Soares PV Prog Orthod; 2022 May; 23(1):17. PubMed ID: 35570252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry. Erozan Ç; Ozan O Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jan; 26():e918529. PubMed ID: 31896741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical assessment of non carious cervical lesion using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Wada I; Shimada Y; Ikeda M; Sadr A; Nakashima S; Tagami J; Sumi Y J Biophotonics; 2015 Oct; 8(10):846-54. PubMed ID: 25504772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Progression of non-carious cervical lesions: 3D morphological analysis. Hayashi M; Kubo S; Pereira PNR; Ikeda M; Takagaki T; Nikaido T; Tagami J Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):575-583. PubMed ID: 34341862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the learning curve of intraoral scanning with two different intraoral scanners based on scanning time. Róth I; Hermann P; Vitai V; Joós-Kovács GL; Géczi Z; Borbély J BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):267. PubMed ID: 37161444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing tooth wear progression in non-human primates: a longitudinal study using intraoral scanning technology. Towle I; Krueger KL; Hernando R; Hlusko LJ PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17614. PubMed ID: 39006010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of toothbrush head configuration and dentifrice abrasivity on non-carious cervical lesions in-vitro. Alzahrani L; Denucci GC; Lippert F; Dehailan LA; Bhamidipalli SS; Hara AT J Dent; 2024 Jan; 140():104798. PubMed ID: 38043721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets. Oginni AO; Adeleke AA J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study. Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability and validity of miniscrews as references in cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner digital models: study on goat heads. Jiang Y; Chen G BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):259. PubMed ID: 31771579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of remote diagnoses using intraoral scans captured in approximate true color: a pilot and validation study in teledentistry. Steinmeier S; Wiedemeier D; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):266. PubMed ID: 32977794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Trueness of Crown Preparation Dies in Dental Models: An In Vitro Assessment of Digital and Analog Workflows. Auskalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevicius D; Rutkunas V Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):89-98. PubMed ID: 38498861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) in a random sampling community population and the association of NCCLs with occlusive wear. Yang J; Cai D; Wang F; He D; Ma L; Jin Y; Que K J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 43(12):960-966. PubMed ID: 27658541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of Tooth Preparation Design and Scan Angulations on the Accuracy of Two Intraoral Digital Scanners: An in Vitro Study Based on 3-Dimensional Comparisons. Ammoun R; Suprono MS; Goodacre CJ; Oyoyo U; Carrico CK; Kattadiyil MT J Prosthodont; 2020 Mar; 29(3):201-206. PubMed ID: 31994818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions among the general population of the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Zuza A; Racic M; Ivkovic N; Krunic J; Stojanovic N; Bozovic D; Bankovic-Lazarevic D; Vujaskovic M Int Dent J; 2019 Aug; 69(4):281-288. PubMed ID: 30730056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]