These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38263548)

  • 1. The use of neurobiological evidence in sentencing mitigation.
    Khalid Z; Lee R; Wall BW
    Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(2):65-78. PubMed ID: 38263548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capital sentencing and neuropsychiatry.
    Brakel SJ; Tucker DE
    Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 38163822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The guilty mind and criminal sentencing: integrating legal and empirical inquiry as illustrated by capital sentencing.
    Schopp RF; Patry MW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):631-51. PubMed ID: 14502693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PTSD and Trauma as Mitigating Factors in Sentencing in Capital Cases.
    Hiromoto L; Keltner C; Frizzell W; Chien J; Sparr L
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2022 Mar; 50(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 34789502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nature, nurture, and capital punishment: How evidence of a genetic-environment interaction, future dangerousness, and deliberation affect sentencing decisions.
    Gordon N; Greene E
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 28881042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession.
    Kermani EJ; Kantor JE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8193393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.
    Greene E; Cahill BS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 22213023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychiatric participation in capital sentencing procedures: ethical considerations.
    Showalter CR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(4):261-80. PubMed ID: 2286492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A jury of scientists: Formal education in biobehavioral sciences reduces the odds of punitive criminal sentencing.
    Thomaidou MA; Berryessa CM
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):787-817. PubMed ID: 35978472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
    Bonnie RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Race, Ethnicity, and Punishment for Federal Sex Offenses: Changing Composition in Child Pornography and Sex Abuse Cases and Temporal Disparity in Sentencing Over Time.
    Hartley RD; Testa A; Martinez E
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Dec; 33(8):891-922. PubMed ID: 33345715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the Decision of Death in Hurst v. Florida.
    Cooke BK; Ginory A; Zedalis J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 28003393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying Roper v. Simmons in juvenile transfer and waiver proceedings: a legal and neuroscientific inquiry.
    Fabian JM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Aug; 55(5):732-55. PubMed ID: 20525819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The potential influence of criminological rationales in considering childhood abuse as mitigating to sentencing.
    Berryessa CM
    Child Abuse Negl; 2021 Jan; 111():104818. PubMed ID: 33223305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Term-of-Years Sentences Since
    Piel JL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Mar; 48(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 31980456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cultural considerations in the criminal law: the sentencing process.
    Boehnlein JK; Schaefer MN; Bloom JD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 16186197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining jurors' ability to meet the constitutional requirement of narrowing in capital sentencing.
    Holleran LB; Vaughan TJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jul; 38(4):317-336. PubMed ID: 32291823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.