BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38263596)

  • 21. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
    Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Successful Oocyte Cryopreservation in Reproductive-Aged Cancer Survivors.
    Druckenmiller S; Goldman KN; Labella PA; Fino ME; Bazzocchi A; Noyes N
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 127(3):474-480. PubMed ID: 26855092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature.
    Brouillet S; Ranisavljevic N; Sonigo C; Haquet E; Bringer-Deutsch S; Loup-Cabaniols V; Hamamah S; Willems M; Anahory T
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 37381072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.
    Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long term pregnancy outcomes of women with cancer following fertility preservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xu Z; Ibrahim S; Burdett S; Rydzewska L; Al Wattar BH; Davies MC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():41-48. PubMed ID: 36535069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
    Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases.
    Saito S; Yamada M; Yano R; Takahashi K; Ebara A; Sakanaka H; Matsumoto M; Ishimaru T; Utsuno H; Matsuzawa Y; Ooka R; Fukuoka M; Akashi K; Kamijo S; Hamatani T; Tanaka M
    J Ovarian Res; 2023 Aug; 16(1):159. PubMed ID: 37563616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in 418 girls and adolescents up to 15 years of age facing highly gonadotoxic treatment. Twenty years of experience at a single center.
    Poirot C; Brugieres L; Yakouben K; Prades-Borio M; Marzouk F; de Lambert G; Pacquement H; Bernaudin F; Neven B; Paye-Jaouen A; Pondarre C; Dhedin N; Drouineaud V; Chalas C; Martelli H; Michon J; Minard V; Lezeau H; Doz F; Sarnacki S; Philippe-Chomette P; Dufour C; Laurence V; Baruchel A; Wolf JP; Boissel N; Valteau-Couanet D; Dalle JH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 May; 98(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 30919447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A prospective study of women and girls undergoing fertility preservation due to oncologic and non-oncologic indications in Sweden-Trends in patients' choices and benefit of the chosen methods after long-term follow up.
    Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Marklund A; Lundberg F; Wikander I; Milenkovic M; Anastacio A; Sergouniotis F; Wånggren K; Ekengren J; Lind T; Borgström B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 May; 98(5):604-615. PubMed ID: 30723910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ovarian response and follow-up outcomes in women diagnosed with cancer having fertility preservation: Comparison of random start and early follicular phase stimulation - cohort study.
    Muteshi C; Child T; Ohuma E; Fatum M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():10-14. PubMed ID: 30227359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives.
    Martinez F
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1802-1811. PubMed ID: 29117320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Survey of Women Who Cryopreserved Oocytes for Non-medical Indications (Social Fertility Preservation).
    Seyhan A; Akin OD; Ertaş S; Ata B; Yakin K; Urman B
    Reprod Sci; 2021 Aug; 28(8):2216-2222. PubMed ID: 33449346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of aromatase inhibitor on controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in adolescent and young cancer patients.
    Suzuki R; Horage-Okutsu Y; Kawahara T; Nakamura K; Shiraishi E; Iwahata H; Suzuki-Takahashi Y; Sugishita Y; Takae S; Suzuki N
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Mar; 49(3):973-979. PubMed ID: 36606606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Similar in vitro maturation rates of oocytes retrieved during the follicular or luteal phase offer flexible options for urgent fertility preservation in breast cancer patients.
    Grynberg M; Poulain M; le Parco S; Sifer C; Fanchin R; Frydman N
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 26759139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oocyte cryopreservation versus ovarian tissue cryopreservation for adult female oncofertility patients: a cost-effectiveness study.
    Chung EH; Lim SL; Myers E; Moss HA; Acharya KS
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Sep; 38(9):2435-2443. PubMed ID: 33977465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nationwide survey of fertility preservation in patients with hematological malignancies in Japan.
    Okamoto S; Fujii N; Yoshioka N; Harada M; Tanimoto M; Maeda Y; Suzuki N; Osuga Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Feb; 26(2):438-442. PubMed ID: 33068221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Systematic proposal of fertility preservation by mature oocyte cryopreservation for recurrent benign ovarian tumors].
    Dadoun Y; Azaïs H; Keller L; d'Orazio E; Collinet P; Decanter C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Jun; 45(6):359-365. PubMed ID: 28506797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.
    Blakemore JK; Grifo JA; DeVore SM; Hodes-Wertz B; Berkeley AS
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1511-1520. PubMed ID: 33712289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling of live-birth rates and cost-effectiveness of oocyte cryopreservation for cancer patients prior to high- and low-risk gonadotoxic chemotherapy.
    Lyttle Schumacher B; Grover N; Mesen T; Steiner A; Mersereau J
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2049-2055. PubMed ID: 28938728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.