159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38263826)
1. Computer-extracted global radiomic features can predict the radiologists' first impression about the abnormality of a screening mammogram.
Siviengphanom S; Lewis SJ; Brennan PC; Gandomkar Z
Br J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 97(1153):168-179. PubMed ID: 38263826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Global Radiomic Features from Mammography for Predicting Difficult-To-Interpret Normal Cases.
Siviengphanom S; Gandomkar Z; Lewis SJ; Brennan PC
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Aug; 36(4):1541-1552. PubMed ID: 37253894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using global feedback to induce learning of gist of abnormality in mammograms.
Raat EM; Kyle-Davidson C; Evans KK
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jan; 8(1):3. PubMed ID: 36617595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection.
Gandomkar Z; Siviengphanom S; Ekpo EU; Suleiman M; Taba ST; Li T; Xu D; Evans KK; Lewis SJ; Wolfe JM; Brennan PC
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20122. PubMed ID: 34635726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiologists can detect the 'gist' of breast cancer before any overt signs of cancer appear.
Brennan PC; Gandomkar Z; Ekpo EU; Tapia K; Trieu PD; Lewis SJ; Wolfe JM; Evans KK
Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8717. PubMed ID: 29880817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparable prediction of breast cancer risk from a glimpse or a first impression of a mammogram.
Raat EM; Farr I; Wolfe JM; Evans KK
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Nov; 6(1):72. PubMed ID: 34743266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of radiologists' first impression when interpreting a screening mammogram.
Gandomkar Z; Siviengphanom S; Suleiman M; Wong D; Reed W; Ekpo EU; Xu D; Lewis SJ; Evans KK; Wolfe JM; Brennan PC
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0284605. PubMed ID: 37098013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinicopathologic breast cancer characteristics: predictions using global textural features of the ipsilateral breast mammogram.
Kanbayti IH; Rae WID; McEntee MF; Gandomkar Z; Ekpo EU
Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Sep; 14(3):248-261. PubMed ID: 34076829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multi-stage fusion framework to classify breast lesions using deep learning and radiomics features computed from four-view mammograms.
Jones MA; Sadeghipour N; Chen X; Islam W; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7670-7683. PubMed ID: 37083190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Prediction by Mammographic Radiomic Features.
Ma W; Zhao Y; Ji Y; Guo X; Jian X; Liu P; Wu S
Acad Radiol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29526548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics predicts preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis to support surgical decisions and is associated with tumor microenvironment in invasive breast cancer: A machine learning, multicenter study.
Yu Y; He Z; Ouyang J; Tan Y; Chen Y; Gu Y; Mao L; Ren W; Wang J; Lin L; Wu Z; Liu J; Ou Q; Hu Q; Li A; Chen K; Li C; Lu N; Li X; Su F; Liu Q; Xie C; Yao H
EBioMedicine; 2021 Jul; 69():103460. PubMed ID: 34233259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.
Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Peng H; Luo Y; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):314-321. PubMed ID: 29159811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of digital mammography-based radiomics in the differentiation of benign and malignant round-like breast tumors and the prediction of molecular subtypes.
Wang L; Yang W; Xie X; Liu W; Wang H; Shen J; Ding Y; Zhang B; Song B
Gland Surg; 2020 Dec; 9(6):2005-2016. PubMed ID: 33447551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting the "gist" of breast cancer in mammograms three years before localized signs of cancer are visible.
Evans KK; Culpan AM; Wolfe JM
Br J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 92(1099):20190136. PubMed ID: 31166769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-modality radiomics model predicts axillary lymph node metastasis of breast cancer using MRI and mammography.
Wang Q; Lin Y; Ding C; Guan W; Zhang X; Jia J; Zhou W; Liu Z; Bai G
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38337068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early signs of cancer present in the fine detail of mammograms.
Raat EM; Evans KK
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282872. PubMed ID: 37018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing the radiomics-machine-learning model based on non-contrast enhanced CT for the simplified risk categorization of thymic epithelial tumors: A large cohort retrospective study.
Feng XL; Wang SZ; Chen HH; Huang YX; Xin YK; Zhang T; Cheng DL; Mao L; Li XL; Liu CX; Hu YC; Wang W; Cui GB; Nan HY
Lung Cancer; 2022 Apr; 166():150-160. PubMed ID: 35287067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feature fusion Siamese network for breast cancer detection comparing current and prior mammograms.
Bai J; Jin A; Wang T; Yang C; Nabavi S
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3654-3669. PubMed ID: 35271746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
