These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38263959)

  • 1. Sound masking by a low-pitch speech-shaped noise improves a social robot's talk in noisy environments.
    Pourfannan H; Mahzoon H; Yoshikawa Y; Ishiguro H
    Front Robot AI; 2023; 10():1205209. PubMed ID: 38263959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards a simultaneously speaking bilingual robot: Primary study on the effect of gender and pitch of the robot's voice.
    Pourfannan H; Mahzoon H; Yoshikawa Y; Ishiguro H
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278852. PubMed ID: 36576933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finding a mate at a cocktail party: Spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs.
    Bee MA
    Anim Behav; 2008 May; 75(5):1781-1791. PubMed ID: 19412318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does increasing the intelligibility of a competing sound source interfere more with speech comprehension in older adults than it does in younger adults?
    Lu Z; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2655-2677. PubMed ID: 27566326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory distraction by speech: Sound masking with speech-shaped stationary noise outperforms -5 dB per octave shaped noise.
    Renz T; Leistner P; Liebl A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):EL212. PubMed ID: 29604706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory distraction by speech: Comparison of fluctuating and steady speech-like masking sounds.
    Renz T; Leistner P; Liebl A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):EL83. PubMed ID: 30180670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distracting linguistic information impairs neural tracking of attended speech.
    Dai B; McQueen JM; Terporten R; Hagoort P; Kösem A
    Curr Res Neurobiol; 2022; 3():100043. PubMed ID: 36518343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech privacy and annoyance considerations in the acoustic environment of passenger cars of high-speed trains.
    Jeon JY; Hong JY; Jang HS; Kim JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3976-84. PubMed ID: 26723351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Office noise: Can headphones and masking sound attenuate distraction by background speech?
    Jahncke H; Björkeholm P; Marsh JE; Odelius J; Sörqvist P
    Work; 2016 Nov; 55(3):505-513. PubMed ID: 27768004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reducing noise nuisance in open-plan office rooms by masking unwanted sounds with pyramid-shaped sound columns].
    Mikulski W
    Med Pr; 2022 Jun; 73(3):229-240. PubMed ID: 35678365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How competing speech interferes with speech comprehension in everyday listening situations.
    Schneider BA; Li L; Daneman M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007; 18(7):559-72. PubMed ID: 18236644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency.
    Auinger AB; Liepins R; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 33369941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mitigation of informational masking in individuals with single-sided deafness by integrated bone conduction hearing aids.
    May BJ; Bowditch S; Liu Y; Eisen M; Niparko JK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24067501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals.
    Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Kösem A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL249. PubMed ID: 28372048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of speech masking on neural tracking of acoustic and semantic features of natural speech.
    Yasmin S; Irsik VC; Johnsrude IS; Herrmann B
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Jul; 186():108584. PubMed ID: 37169066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.