These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38264777)

  • 1. A reformulation of Fisher's runaway identifies the heritability of mate choices as a key parameter and highlights limitations of the hypothesis.
    Fry JD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 291(2015):20232366. PubMed ID: 38264777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 1994 Jun; 48(3):853-867. PubMed ID: 28568273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fisher's lost model of runaway sexual selection.
    Henshaw JM; Jones AG
    Evolution; 2020 Feb; 74(2):487-494. PubMed ID: 31886520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION.
    Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y; Nee S
    Evolution; 1991 Sep; 45(6):1422-1430. PubMed ID: 28563819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Runaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected.
    Hall DW; Kirkpatrick M; West B
    Evolution; 2000 Dec; 54(6):1862-9. PubMed ID: 11209766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Apr; 95(9):5106-11. PubMed ID: 9560236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Runaway evolution from male-male competition.
    Moore AJ; McGlothlin JW; Wolf JB
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Feb; 25(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 34784652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of phenotypes and genetic parameters under preferential mating.
    Roff DA; Fairbairn DJ
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Jul; 4(13):2759-76. PubMed ID: 25077025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continual change in mate preferences.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6548):420-2. PubMed ID: 7566117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breeding experience and the heritability of female mate choice in collared flycatchers.
    Hegyi G; Herényi M; Wilson AJ; Garamszegi LZ; Rosivall B; Eens M; Török J
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13855. PubMed ID: 21079813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conformity in mate choice, the overlooked social component of animal and human culture.
    Nöbel S; Jacquet A; Isabel G; Pocheville A; Seabright P; Danchin E
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Feb; 98(1):132-149. PubMed ID: 36173001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.