These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38264777)

  • 21. Bias in the heritability of preference and its potential impact on the evolution of mate choice.
    Roff DA; Fairbairn DJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Apr; 114(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 25604948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of the strength of mate preference from mated pairs observed in the wild.
    Clancey E; Johnson TR; Harmon LJ; Hohenlohe PA
    Evolution; 2022 Jan; 76(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 34792183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
    Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM.
    Heywood JS
    Evolution; 1989 Nov; 43(7):1387-1397. PubMed ID: 28564247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the logic of Fisherian sexual selection.
    Veller C; Muralidhar P; Haig D
    Evolution; 2020 Jul; 74(7):1234-1245. PubMed ID: 32128812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Runaway sexual selection leads to good genes.
    Chandler CH; Ofria C; Dworkin I
    Evolution; 2013 Jan; 67(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 23289565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects.
    Day T
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):715-30. PubMed ID: 10937247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The causes of variation in the presence of genetic covariance between sexual traits and preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 25808899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. PERSPECTIVE: INDIRECT MATE CHOICE, COMPETITION FOR MATES, AND COEVOLUTION OF THE SEXES.
    Wiley RH; Poston J
    Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1371-1381. PubMed ID: 28565703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Remodeling male coercion and the evolution of sexual autonomy by mate choice.
    Snow SS; Prum RO
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(7):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 37260260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is biased mutation sufficient to save runaway sexual selection?
    Dashtbali M; Henshaw JM
    Evolution; 2024 Jul; 78(8):1478-1485. PubMed ID: 38747625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Density-dependent selection on mate search and evolution of Allee effects.
    Berec L; Kramer AM; Bernhauerová V; Drake JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 28240356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Testing the correlated response hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of male mating preferences in Drosophila serrata.
    Gosden TP; Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2106-12. PubMed ID: 25078542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection.
    Brooks R; Endler JA
    Evolution; 2001 Aug; 55(8):1644-55. PubMed ID: 11580024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.