BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38265434)

  • 21. The state of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in Chinese mainland: A systematic literature review.
    Ding J; Zhang C; Huang D; Zhang Y
    Biosci Trends; 2020 Jan; 13(6):488-501. PubMed ID: 31875583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.
    Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Kendrick ML; van Hilst J; Boggi U; de Rooij T; Walsh RM; Zeh HJ; Hughes SJ; Nakamura Y; Vollmer CM; Kooby DA; Asbun HJ;
    HPB (Oxford); 2017 Mar; 19(3):215-224. PubMed ID: 28317658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?
    Gumbs AA; Chouillard E; Abu Hilal M; Croner R; Gayet B; Gagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5256-5267. PubMed ID: 33146810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Getting Started with Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Worth It?
    Liang S; Jayaraman S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Sep; 25(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 26375771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy by junior surgeon: Initial experience of the next generation.
    Kim SH; Hong SS; Kang CM
    World J Surg; 2024 Jun; 48(6):1492-1500. PubMed ID: 38578427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of unplanned conversion to an open procedure during minimally invasive pancreatectomy.
    Stiles ZE; Dickson PV; Deneve JL; Glazer ES; Dong L; Wan JY; Behrman SW
    J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():168-177. PubMed ID: 29804849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients.
    Nassour I; Wang SC; Christie A; Augustine MM; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Mansour JC; Xie XJ; Polanco PM; Minter RM
    Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28486387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Uijterwijk BA; Wei K; Kasai M; Ielpo B; Hilst JV; Chinnusamy P; Lemmers DHL; Burdio F; Senthilnathan P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Qin R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 37076411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictors and outcomes of converted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Hester CA; Nassour I; Christie A; Augustine MM; Mansour JC; Polanco PM; Porembka MR; Shoultz TH; Wang SC; Yopp AC; Zeh HJ; Minter RM
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):544-550. PubMed ID: 31016458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
    Qin H; Qiu J; Zhao Y; Pan G; Zeng Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104274. PubMed ID: 25119463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States.
    Adam MA; Thomas S; Youngwirth L; Pappas T; Roman SA; Sosa JA
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):336-342. PubMed ID: 28030713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Williams MD; Bhama AR; Naffouje S; Kamarajah SK; Becerra AZ; Zhang Y; Pappas SG; Dahdaleh FS
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jan; 27(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36357742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
    Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Which one is better? Laparoscopic versus robotic reconstruction in the remnant soft pancreas with a small pancreatic duct following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter study with propensity score matching analysis.
    Jang JY; Kang CM; Kim H; Choi M; Lee JH; Choi SH
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):4028-4039. PubMed ID: 36097095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comprehensive review.
    Wang M; Cai H; Meng L; Cai Y; Wang X; Li Y; Peng B
    Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():139-146. PubMed ID: 27664556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pędziwiatr M; Małczak P; Pisarska M; Major P; Wysocki M; Stefura T; Budzyński A
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Aug; 402(5):841-851. PubMed ID: 28488004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.
    Lof S; van der Heijde N; Abuawwad M; Al-Sarireh B; Boggi U; Butturini G; Capretti G; Coratti A; Casadei R; D'Hondt M; Esposito A; Ferrari G; Fusai G; Giardino A; Groot Koerkamp B; Hackert T; Kamarajah S; Kauffmann EF; Keck T; Marudanayagam R; Nickel F; Manzoni A; Pessaux P; Pietrabissa A; Rosso E; Salvia R; Soonawalla Z; White S; Zerbi A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Br J Surg; 2021 Mar; 108(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 33711145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective minimally invasive pancreatic resections from the IGOMIPS registry: a snapshot of daily practice in Italy on 1191 between 2019 and 2022.
    Boggi U; Donisi G; Napoli N; Partelli S; Esposito A; Ferrari G; Butturini G; Morelli L; Abu Hilal M; Viola M; Di Benedetto F; Troisi R; Vivarelli M; Jovine E; Ferrero A; Bracale U; Alfieri S; Casadei R; Ercolani G; Moraldi L; Molino C; Dalla Valle R; Ettorre G; Memeo R; Zanus G; Belli A; Gruttadauria S; Brolese A; Coratti A; Garulli G; Romagnoli R; Massani M; Borghi F; Belli G; Coppola R; Falconi M; Salvia R; Zerbi A;
    Updates Surg; 2023 Sep; 75(6):1439-1456. PubMed ID: 37470915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.
    Emmen AMLH; Görgec B; Zwart MJW; Daams F; Erdmann J; Festen S; Gouma DJ; van Gulik TM; van Hilst J; Kazemier G; Lof S; Sussenbach SI; Tanis PJ; Zonderhuis BM; Busch OR; Swijnenburg RJ; Besselink MG;
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2659-2672. PubMed ID: 36401105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.