These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38266556)
1. Sonography-based multimodal information platform for identifying the surgical pathology of ductal carcinoma in situ. Wu H; Jiang Y; Tian H; Ye X; Cui C; Shi S; Chen M; Ding Z; Li S; Huang Z; Luo Y; Peng Q; Xu J; Dong F Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Mar; 245():108039. PubMed ID: 38266556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High rate of postoperative upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ when prioritizing ultrasound evaluation of mammography-detected lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Hsieh YC; Lo C; Lee YH; Chien N; Lu TP; Tsai LW; Wang MY; Kuo WH; Chang YC; Huang CS World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Feb; 21(1):48. PubMed ID: 36804000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of deep learning on mammographies to discriminate between low and high-risk DCIS for patient participation in active surveillance trials. Alaeikhanehshir S; Voets MM; van Duijnhoven FH; Lips EH; Groen EJ; van Oirsouw MCJ; Hwang SE; Lo JY; Wesseling J; Mann RM; Teuwen J; Cancer Imaging; 2024 Apr; 24(1):48. PubMed ID: 38576031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting Upstaging of DCIS to Invasive Disease: Radiologists's Predictive Performance. Selvakumaran V; Hou R; Baker JA; Yoon SC; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Litton TP; Lu LX; Devalapalli A; Kim C; Soo MS; Hwang ES; Lo JY; Grimm LJ Acad Radiol; 2020 Nov; 27(11):1580-1585. PubMed ID: 32001164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of Upstaging in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Based on Mammographic Radiomic Features. Hou R; Grimm LJ; Mazurowski MA; Marks JR; King LM; Maley CC; Lynch T; van Oirsouw M; Rogers K; Stone N; Wallis M; Teuwen J; Wesseling J; Hwang ES; Lo JY Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34981975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound deep learning radiomics and clinical machine learning models to predict low nuclear grade, ER, PR, and HER2 receptor status in pure ductal carcinoma Zhu M; Kuang Y; Jiang Z; Liu J; Zhang H; Zhao H; Luo H; Chen Y; Peng Y Gland Surg; 2024 Apr; 13(4):512-527. PubMed ID: 38720675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating Upstaging in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Preoperative MRI-Based Radiomics. Hong M; Fan S; Yu Z; Gao C; Fang Z; Du L; Wang S; Chen X; Xu M; Zhou C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Aug; 58(2):454-463. PubMed ID: 36440711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep-learning model to improve histological grading and predict upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia / ductal carcinoma in situ on breast biopsy. Huang CY; Chang RF; Lin CY; Hsieh MS; Liao PC; Wang YJ; Kao YC; Porta L; Lin PY; Lee CC; Lee YH Histopathology; 2024 May; 84(6):983-1002. PubMed ID: 38288642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of Underestimation Using Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Patients Diagnosed as Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Preoperative Core Biopsy. Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Park SY; Ahn SH; Son BH; Chung IY; Lee JW; Ko BS; Kim JS; Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Apr; 22(3):e374-e386. PubMed ID: 34776365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. US, Mammography, and Histopathologic Evaluation to Identify Low Nuclear Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. Lee SE; Kim GR; Han K; Kim EH; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Park VY; Moon HJ Radiology; 2022 May; 303(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 35166586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mixed-Methods Study to Predict Upstaging of DCIS to Invasive Disease on Mammography. Grimm LJ; Neely B; Hou R; Selvakumaran V; Baker JA; Yoon SC; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Litton TP; Devalapalli A; Kim C; Soo MS; Hyslop T; Hwang ES; Lo JY AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):903-911. PubMed ID: 32783550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Be Predicted Using Computer-extracted Mammographic Features? Shi B; Grimm LJ; Mazurowski MA; Baker JA; Marks JR; King LM; Maley CC; Hwang ES; Lo JY Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 28506510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Hwang ES; Soo MS Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 28705686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Yi J; Lee EH; Kwak JJ; Cha JG; Jung SH Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24497787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting underestimation of ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparison between radiomics and conventional approaches. Li J; Song Y; Xu S; Wang J; Huang H; Ma W; Jiang X; Wu Y; Cai H; Li L Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Apr; 14(4):709-721. PubMed ID: 30569330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions. Tonegutti M; Girardi V Radiol Med; 2008 Feb; 113(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 18338128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]